Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=1,000 Randomized Diagnostic

Prospective Trial to Compare the Clinical Efficiency of G-EYE™ HD Colonoscopy With Standard HD Colonoscopy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01917513 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
1,000
Serious AEs
0.2%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Detection Rate of Adenomas and Serrated Lesions — 147; 194 Participants

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the adenoma detection rate of G-EYE™ high definition colonoscopy with that of standard high definition colonoscopy

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Detection Rate of Adenomas and Serrated Lesions
147; 194
SECONDARY
Number of Polyp and Adenoma Detection, Procedure Times and Safety (Number of Patients With Adverse Events.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients over 50 years old
  • Referred to colonoscopy for screening, following positive FOBT testing, change of bowel habits or for surveillance colonoscopy (history of adenoma resection).
  • The patient must understand and provide written consent for the procedure.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with inflammatory bowel disease;
  • Subjects with a personal history of polyposis syndrome;
  • Subjects with suspected chronic stricture potentially precluding complete colonoscopy;
  • Subjects with diverticulitis or toxic megacolon;
  • Subjects with a history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis;
  • Pregnant or lactating female subjects;
  • Subjects who are currently enrolled in another clinical investigation.
  • Subjects with current oral or parenteral use of anticoagulants
  • Subjects with recent (within the last 3 mounts) coronary ischemia or CVA (stroke)
  • Any patient condition deemed too risky for the study by the investigator
  • Previous colonic surgery (except for appendectomy)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01917513). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search