Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=100 Single-blind Treatment

Evaluation of Pain and Inflammation After Injection of Lucentis vs Eylea for Treatment of Wet Macular Degeneration

Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Evidence of Anterior Chamber Inflammation — 1; 10; 0; 1 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Ranibizumab 0.5mg (Drug); Aflibercept 2.0mg (Drug)
Age
Older Adult · 65+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Arshad Khanani
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Evidence of Anterior Chamber Inflammation
1; 10; 0; 1
SECONDARY
Patients With Post Injection Pain Score of One or Higher on Pain Scale
7; 9; 0; 1

Summary

This study is designed to compare the post injection inflammation and pain seen after intravitreal injections of Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Able to provide informed consent and comply with study assessments for the full duration of the study
  • Age >/= 65 years
  • New onset Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration or (See No.4)
  • Previously treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Lucentis or Eylea intravitreal injections
  • Visual Acuity of 20/400 or better
  • No history of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments -

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of Endophthalmitis in either eye
  • Uncontrolled or symptomatic Dry Eye Syndrome
  • History of Anterior or Posterior Uveitis
  • History of Post injection pain or inflammation with prior treatments
  • Recent thromboembolic event(<3 months)
  • Pregnancy(positive pregnancy test) or Lactation/Premenopausal women not using adequate contraception -
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01926977). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search