Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 1 N=52 Randomized Treatment

Nicardipine vs Esmolol Craniotomy Emergence

Brain Tumors

Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Failure of Drug to Control Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 140 mmHg — 1; 11 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Interventions
Nicardipine (Drug); Esmolol (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Northwestern University
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Failure of Drug to Control Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 140 mmHg
1; 11

Summary

Emergence hypertension is a common occurrence in patients emerging from general anesthesia. This elevation of arterial pressure is particularly concerning in patients undergoing craniotomy due to increased risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with altered intracranial elastance. Thus, identifying better methods to attenuate the hemodynamic changes associated with emergence from anesthesia can improve patient safety, especially in the neurosurgical patient. Study Hypothesis: Nicardipine is more effective than esmolol as a sole agent in maintaining blood pressure within goal range in the setting of emergence hypertension after craniotomy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult
  • non-pregnant patients
  • (age ≥ 18 years)
  • undergoing general anesthesia for elective supratentorial, infratentorial, or transsphenoidal craniotomy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • non-English speaking, pregnancy
  • emergent craniotomy (including trauma)
  • awake craniotomy
  • active 3 vessel coronary artery disease or left main coronary artery disease
  • advanced heart block
  • severe aortic stenosis
  • chronic renal failure
  • known or suspected allergy or intolerance to a study drug or its components
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01951950). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search