Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=30 Randomized Other

Self-Weighing Instruction Feasibility Study

Weight Loss · Body Weight

Enrolled (actual)
30
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Adherence to Weight Tracking Instructions — 98.3; 96.7 percentage of postcards returned — p=.15

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
weighing frequency instructions and tips (Behavioral)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
Primary completion
May 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Adherence to Weight Tracking Instructions
98.3; 96.7 .15
SECONDARY
Changes in Depression Ratings
3.6; 6.3; 3.9; 7.1; 4.8; 6.7 0.61
SECONDARY
Changes in Anxiety
2.3; 5.7; 2.7; 5.8; 3.9; 5.3 0.50
SECONDARY
Changes in Body Image
20.1; 19.1; 22.6; 17.9; 21.4; 18.5 0.15
SECONDARY
Changes in Barriers to Weight Tracking
39.7; 46.7; 27.5; 37.3; 30.7; 34.3 0.30
SECONDARY
Changes in Perceptions of Weight Tracking
47.7; 40.4; 48.2; 45.0 0.17

Summary

Scant data have been reported on the effects of weight self-monitoring during weight control. The purpose of this pilot project was to consider the questions: Is it possible to assign participants to engage in daily weight self-monitoring, and are there differential effects on mood of daily versus weekly weighing?

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Body mass index between 25 and 35 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

  • Current weight loss program participation
  • Chronic health conditions (diabetes, cancer, heart disease, psychiatric disorders requiring medication)
  • Current or past eating disorder
  • Current pregnancy or pregnant in past year
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01966926). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search