Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=39 Treatment

Multiple Dose Study of Blockade of Opioid Effects by Injections of Buprenorphine in Participants With Opioid Disorder

Opioid Use Disorder

Enrolled (actual)
39
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Opioid Blockade Following Administration of Hydromorphone Challenge As Measured Using the Subjective Opioid Effects Rating for the Question "Do You Like the Drug?" Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 1-4 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures — 1.447; 5.103; 8.374; 1.850 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Buprenorphine (Drug); buprenorphine and naloxone (Drug); hydromorphone (Drug); placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Indivior Inc.
Primary completion
Jul 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Opioid Blockade Following Administration of Hydromorphone Challenge As Measured Using the Subjective Opioid Effects Rating for the Question "Do You Like the Drug?" Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Weeks 1-4 Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
1.447; 5.103; 8.374; 1.850; 2.436; 4.750
SECONDARY
Reinforcing Effects (Breakpoint) by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
4.984; 7.121; 7.042; 4.767; 5.379; 5.708
SECONDARY
Reinforcing Effects Of the Daily Randomized Hydromorphone Challenge as Measured by the Mean Hydromorphone Break Point Value at Weeks 1-12
2.070; 2.336; 2.479; 1.753; 2.075; 2.387
SECONDARY
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
39; 29; 26; 25; 25; 0
SECONDARY
Plasma Concentrations of Buprenorphine Summarized by Study Week
0.000; 0.000; 0.000; 2.030; 2.164; 2.042
SECONDARY
Predicted mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO) by Mean Buprenorphine Concentrations and Study Week
0.000; 0.000; 0.000; 67.077; 67.875; 67.089
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in Reinforcing Effects (Breakpoint) by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
0.93; 0.89; 0.27; 0.41; 0.32; 0.63
SECONDARY
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score for "Do You Like the Drug?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
2.892; 48.252; 63.503; 1.447; 5.103; 8.374
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "Do You Like the Drug?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
45.36; 60.61; 3.66; 6.93; 0.59; 2.90
SECONDARY
VAS Score for "How High Are You Right Now?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
2.654; 33.052; 53.597; 1.386; 4.444; 6.240
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "How High Are You Right Now?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
30.40; 50.94; 3.06; 4.85; 0.52; 3.15
SECONDARY
VAS Score for "Do You Feel Any Drug Effect?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
3.274; 39.047; 58.912; 1.200; 4.214; 6.433
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "Do You Feel Any Drug Effect?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
35.77; 55.64; 3.01; 5.23; 1.01; 3.69
SECONDARY
VAS Score for "Does the Drug Have Any Good Effects?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
3.131; 43.888; 61.640; 1.239; 4.252; 7.072
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "Does the Drug Have Any Good Effects?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
40.76; 58.51; 3.01; 5.83; 0.60; 3.50
SECONDARY
VAS Score for "Does the Drug Have Any Bad Effects?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
4.797; 7.145; 11.046; 1.117; 1.159; 1.107
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "Does the Drug Have Any Bad Effects?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
2.35; 6.25; 0.04; -0.01; 0.14; 0.53
SECONDARY
VAS Score for "Do You Feel Sedated?" by Study Week Analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures
3.399; 14.504; 30.979; 1.199; 3.979; 5.401
SECONDARY
Change From Placebo in VAS Score for "Do You Feel Sedated?" by Study Week and Simulated mu Opioid Receptor Occupancy (μORO)
11.10; 27.58; 2.78; 4.20; 0.38; 3.92

Summary

This is a multiple-dose study in non-treatment seeking male and female subjects with moderate to severe opioid use disorder who meet criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) to evaluate the effectiveness of RBP-6000 to block the effects of exogenous opioids. The primary objective of this study was to demonstrate that the "Drug Liking" visual analog scale (VAS) measured after challenge with 6 mg (Dose 1) and 18 mg (Dose 2) hydromorphone was noninferior to the "Drug Liking" visual analog scale (VAS) measured after challenge with placebo at Weeks 1-4 post first injection of subcutaneous buprenorphine 300 mg (RBP-6000).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5) criteria for moderate or severe opioid use disorder at screening and are not seeking opioid use disorder treatment
  • Body mass index of >= 18.0 to <= 33.0 kg/m^2
  • Females - women of childbearing potential (defined as all women who are not surgically sterile or postmenopausal for at least 1 year prior to informed consent) must have negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment and must agree to use a medically acceptable means of contraception from screening through at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug
  • Male subjects with female partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use medically acceptable contraception from screening through at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with any current diagnosis requiring chronic opioid treatment
  • Subjects who currently meet the criteria for diagnosis of moderate or severe substance use disorder by DSM-5 criteria for any substances other than opioids, caffeine, or nicotine.
  • Subjects who have abused or used buprenorphine within 14 days prior to informed consent.

Other protocol-defined criteria may apply.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02044094). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search