Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=500 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Effect of Electroacupuncture Versus PFMT Plus Solifenacin for Mixed Urinary Incontinence

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02047032 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
500
Serious AEs
0.2%
Results posted
Jun 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Change From Baseline in 72-hour Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF) Over Weeks 1-12 — -36.49; -37.83 percent change

Summary

A noninferiority randomized controlled trial aimed at comparing the effect and safety of electroacupuncture versus the pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus solifenacin for mixed urinary incontinence (MUI).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Change From Baseline in 72-hour Incontinence Episode Frequency (IEF) Over Weeks 1-12
-36.49; -37.83
SECONDARY
Percentage of Change From Baseline in Mean 72-hour IEF During Weeks 13-24 and Weeks 25-36
-58.20; -56.69; -64.20; -65.48
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With ≥50% Decrease in Average 72-h Incontinence Episode Frequency
109; 112; 174; 164; 190; 188
SECONDARY
Change of Episodes From Baseline in Average 72-hour Urgencies/Urination/Nocturia Episodes
-2.62; -2.99; -4.75; -4.77; -5.55; -5.55
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) Score
-3.96; -3.73; -6.44; -5.97; -7.06; -6.80
SECONDARY
Weekly Median Number of Urine Pads Used During Weeks 1-12, 13-24, and 25-36
8.0; 9.0; 7.0; 8.0; 8.0; 8.0
SECONDARY
the Amount of Urine Leakage (Grams) Measured by the 1-hour Pad Test at Weeks 4 and 12
-6.74; -6.96; -12.16; -11.49
SECONDARY
Patient's Treatment Satisfaction Degree
58; 62; 84; 112; 80; 56
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impression Improvement
69; 52; 85; 75; 82; 96
SECONDARY
Electroacupuncture Acceptance Assessment
3.0; 3.0; 3.0
SECONDARY
The Number of Participants Using Urine Pads
86; 105; 68; 80; 59; 72
SECONDARY
Change of Episodes From Baseline in Mean 72-h Incontinence Episodes
-4.56; -4.37; -7.27; -6.95; -8.31; -8.22

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • females meet the meet the diagnostic criteria of mixed urinary incontinence
  • aged 35-75 years
  • moderate and severe urinary incontinence with the urinary incontinence severity index between 3 and 9
  • suffering from urinary incontinence at least for 3 months with the 72-h incontinence episode frequency≥2 in the baseline assessment
  • voluntarily join the research and sign the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • pure stress urinary incontinence, pure urgency urinary incontinence, overflow incontinence and neurogenic bladder
  • medicine use for urinary incontinence or may affect the bladder function, or taking any non-drug therapy (such as electric stimulation, bladder training and pelvic floor muscle training) in the last month
  • symptomatic urinary tract infection and non-functional urologic disease
  • having ever undergone an operation for urinary incontinence or on the pelvic floor (including hysterectomy)
  • pelvic organ prolapse degree ≥2
  • residual urinary volume (RUV) >30 mL
  • maximum flow rate (Qmax) <20 mL/s;
  • be allergic to solifenacin or having contradictions for muscarine antagonist (such as urinary retention, gastric retention, myasthenia gravis, ulcerative colitis and angle closure glaucoma)
  • diseases affect function of lower urinary tract, such as uncontrolled diabetes, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, spinal injury, cauda equina injury and multiple system atrophy.
  • serious cardiovascular, pulmonary, cerebral, liver, kidney, hematopoietic system or psychiatric disease and cognitive impairment
  • patients with severe renal dysfunction or moderate hepatic dysfunction who are using strong Cyp3a4 Inhibitor like ketoconazole
  • unable or limited to walking, up and down stairs and running
  • poor compliance with electroacupuncture, pelvic floor muscle training or drug
  • pregnancy, lactation or within the 12 months after birth
  • having a cardiac pacemaker, a metal allergy, or a severe needle phobia.
  • volunteer of other trials
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02047032). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search