Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=240 Randomized Treatment

CetuGEX™ in Comparison to Cetuximab for the Treatment of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

Carcinoma, Squamous Cell of Head and Neck

Enrolled (actual)
240
Serious AEs
62.5%
Results posted
Nov 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Progression-free Survival (PFS) — 27.7; 26.4 weeks — p=0.86

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
CetuGEX™ (Drug); Cetuximab (Drug); Chemotherapy (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Glycotope GmbH
Primary completion
Aug 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
27.7; 26.4 0.86
SECONDARY
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
52; 57 0.77
SECONDARY
Clinical Benefit Rate
88; 94 0.83
SECONDARY
Time to Treatment Failure
22.1; 23.3 0.70
SECONDARY
Overall Survival
49.7; 59.0 0.96
SECONDARY
Time of Global Health Status Deterioration
43.4; 31.3

Summary

The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of CetuGEX™ for the treatment of patients with stage III/IV recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN as compared to cetuximab (both in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy) in terms of progression-free survival (PFS).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with histologically confirmed recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN not eligible for local treatment.
  • Patients with measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1.
  • Patients aged at least 18 years at screening.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Minimum life expectancy of 3 months.
  • Tissue samples available for specific and therapy-related biological assessments.
  • If female and of childbearing potential, was non-lactating and had negative pregnancy test results at screening and prior to randomization.
  • If female, was either not of childbearing potential (defined as postmenopausal for at least 1 year or surgically sterile [bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy]) or willing to use highly effective contraceptives during study participation until 6 months after last administration of any study medication, particularly cisplatin or carboplatin, with a failure rate 1.5 fold above the upper limit of normal ranges, creatinine clearance 5-fold above the upper limit of normal ranges) and patients with hematology parameters outside the normal ranges (hemoglobin <9 g/dL, absolute neutrophil count <1500/mm3 and platelet count <105/mm3) at screening as well as patients with impaired auditory function or platinum-related neuropathy.
  • Clinically active infections ≥Grade 2 using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 and/or requiring intravenous antibiotics.
  • Known active hepatitis B or C.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
  • Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Symptomatic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association Grade 3 or 4), unstable angina pectoris within 6 months prior to screening, significant cardiac arrhythmia, history of stroke, or transient ischemic attack within 1 year prior to screening.
  • History of keratitis requiring medical interventions within the last 5 years or interstitial lung disease.
  • Patients with any other disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, might have interfered with the conduct of the study.
  • Patients with an unstable condition (e.g., psychiatric disorder, a recent history of drug or alcohol abuse, interfering with study compliance, within 6 months prior to screening) or otherwise thought to be unreliable or incapable of complying with the requirements of the protocol.
  • Patients institutionalized by official means or court order.
  • Receipt of any other IMP within the last 30 days before randomization or any previous CetuGEX™ administration.
  • Prior allergic reaction to a monoclonal antibody, grade 3 infusion related reaction (IRR) or any grade 4 reaction to a monoclonal antibody.
  • Known sensitivity to any component of the IMP and medication used in this study.
  • Known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (France only).
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02052960). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search