Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=602 Randomized Quadruple-blind Prevention

Prophylactic Ephedrine and Combined Spinal Epidurals for Labor

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02062801 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
602
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2015
Primary outcomePrimary: Early Profound Fetal Bradycardia — 8; 14 participants — p=0.18

Summary

The combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique has become increasingly popular for labor pain because of its rapid onset and superior first stage analgesia. However, increased risk for early profound fetal bradycardia (EPFB) following CSE continues to be a concern. Various factors are implicated in the etiology of EPFB but the cause is unknown. Ephedrine administration prior to CSE analgesia may help reduce the risk of EPFB, but to date, nobody has studied the impact of a single dose of intravenous (IV) ephedrine given at the time of CSE administration during labor. The purpose of this study is to measure the incidence of EPFB after combined spinal epidural analgesia using standard definitions. The incidence of EPFB will be compared between patients who receive prophylactic ephedrine or placebo at the time of CSE placement.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Early Profound Fetal Bradycardia
8; 14 0.18
SECONDARY
Tetanic (Sustained) Uterine Contraction (TUC)
58; 58 0.97
SECONDARY
Urgent Cesarean Delivery
1; 2 .56

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Ability to speak and understand English
  • Term (37-42 weeks' gestation)
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • ASA 3 or less
  • No pregnancy-induced hypertension
  • No chronic hypertension
  • BMI 39
  • Contraindication to epidural analgesia
  • Twin pregnancy
  • Preterm labor
  • Severe preeclampsia
  • Decision to perform CS prior to epidural insertion
  • Unable to read or speak English
  • Unable or unwilling to sign the IFC
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02062801). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search