Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=8 Randomized Basic Science

Effect of Gain on Closed-Loop Insulin

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02065895 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
8
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) Breakfast — 66.8; 48.8; 37.4 mmol/l/min — p=0.0011

Summary

The purpose of this study is to test the ability of an advanced external Physiologic Insulin Delivery (ePID) algorithm (a step by step process used to develop a solution to a problem) to get acceptable meal responses over a range of gain. Gain is defined as how much insulin is given in response to a change in a patient's glucose level. This study also examines the effectiveness of the external Physiologic Insulin Delivery (ePID) closed-loop insulin delivery computer software. The investigators would like to assess whether fasting target levels can be achieved as the closed-loop gain increases or decreases, and to evaluate the system's ability to produce an acceptable breakfast meal response.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Glucose Area Under the Curve (AUC) Breakfast
66.8; 48.8; 37.4 0.0011 sig
SECONDARY
Peak and Nadir Postprandial Glucose Concentration
13.3; 11.8; 11.3; 4.5; 4.8; 6.6 0.0059 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Type 1 diabetes for > 3 years
  • Manage diabetes using a continuous glucose monitor and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump
  • Non obese (BMI < 30)
  • Aged 18 - 75 years old
  • HbA1c < 8 %

Exclusion Criteria

  • renal or hepatic failure
  • cancer or lymphoma
  • Malabsorption or malnourishment
  • Hypercortisolism
  • Alcoholism or drug abuse
  • Anemia (hematocrit < 36 in females and <40 in males)
  • Eating disorder
  • Dietary restrictions
  • Acetaminophen allergy
  • Chronic acetaminophen use
  • Glucocorticoid therapy
  • History of gastroparesis
  • Use of Beta blockers
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02065895). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search