Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=3 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Developing New Clinical Management Strategies

Major Depressive Disorder

Enrolled (actual)
3
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression — 25; 31 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Escitalopram (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
New York State Psychiatric Institute
Primary completion
Aug 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression
25; 31
SECONDARY
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS) 14-item Scale
9.5; 13
SECONDARY
CGI Severity and Improvement
3; 4
SECONDARY
Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale
SECONDARY
California Pharmacotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS)-Clinician Version
SECONDARY
Blind Assessment-Clinician Version
SECONDARY
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR) 16 Item Scale
SECONDARY
Treatment Credibility and Expectancy Scale (CES)
SECONDARY
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8 (CSQ 8)
SECONDARY
Cornell Treatment Preference Index
SECONDARY
Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R)
SECONDARY
Schedule for Adaptive and Nonadaptive Personality (SNAP)
SECONDARY
California Pharmacotherapy Alliance Scale (CALPAS)-Patient Version
SECONDARY
Blind Assessment-Patient Version

Summary

The goal of this study is to develop new methods of administering antidepressant medications that will result in improved drug/placebo separation in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and enhanced medication response in open clinical treatment. The highly intensive, weekly visit schedule followed in most antidepressant RCTs radically differs from how antidepressant medications are prescribed in standard clinical practice and is believed to be a major reason why the majority of studies submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fail to show a significant difference between medication and placebo. Moreover, a "one size fits all" approach to psychopharmacologic management (i.e., weekly visits for all patients) does not take into account differences between patients that may predispose some individuals to respond positively to frequent follow-up visits, while others may respond negatively or not at all. Clinic visits comprise multiple components that may be therapeutic for depression, including activating patients' behavior, exposing them to medical procedures, permitting social interactions with research staff, and providing supportive meetings with clinicians. Two independent meta-analyses have associated more frequent study visits with increased antidepressant and placebo response as well as decreased separation between medication and placebo. Despite the high costs and potential disadvantages of weekly follow-up visits for patients receiving antidepressant medication, this clinical management strategy has not been studied prospectively to date. It is unknown whether weekly follow-up visits are needed to ensure treatment compliance and patient safety in clinical trials and to what degree contacts with clinicians influence medication and placebo response.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • 1. men and women aged 18-60 years
  • 2. diagnosis with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) IV Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
  • 3. 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) score greater than or equal to 18
  • 4. capable of providing informed consent and complying with study procedures
  • 5. using appropriate contraceptive method if woman of child-bearing age

Exclusion Criteria

  • 1. Current comorbid Axis I DSM IV disorder other than Nicotine Dependence, Adjustment Disorder, or Anxiety Disorder
  • 2. diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence (excluding Nicotine Dependence) within the past 12 months
  • 3. present or past history of psychosis, psychotic disorder, mania, or bipolar disorder
  • 4. baseline HRSD score > 28 or HRSD suicide item > 2
  • 5. history of allergic or adverse reaction to escitalopram, or non-response to adequate trial of escitalopram (at least 4 weeks at dose of 20mg) during the current episode
  • 6. current treatment with psychotherapy, antidepressants, antipsychotics, or mood stabilizers
  • 7. CGI-Severity score of 7 at baseline
  • 8. acute, severe, or unstable medical illness
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02082392). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search