Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=31 Randomized Treatment

A Trial Comparing Sequential Addition of Insulin Aspart Versus Further Dose Increase With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Previously Treated With Insulin Degludec/Liraglutide and Metformin and in Need of Further Intensification

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02100475 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
31
Serious AEs
9.7%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin) — -0.43; -0.14 Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin — p=0.427
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

This trial is conducted globally. The aim of the trial is to compare sequential addition of insulin aspart versus further dose increase with insulin degludec/liraglutide in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus, previously treated with insulin degludec/liraglutide and metformin and in need of further intensification. This is an extension to trial NN9068-3952, NCT01952145 (DUAL™ V).

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
-0.43; -0.14 0.427
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
0.9; 1.5
SECONDARY
Number of Treatment-emergent Confirmed Hypoglycaemic Episodes
34; 4

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Completion (Visit 28) of NN9068-3952 with insulin degludec/liraglutide + metformin
  • HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) above or equal to 7 percent at Visit 27 of NN9068-3952 trial

Exclusion Criteria

  • Clinically significant diseases of the major organ systems
  • Screening calcitonin above or equal to 50 ng/L
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02100475). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search