Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=8

Technical Efficacy of a Direction Specific Radiofrequency Device in the Performance of Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomies

Low Back Pain

Enrolled (actual)
8
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Patients With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Evidence of Tissue Ablation/Edema at Targeted Lumbar Medial Branches — 100 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Lumbar MB RFN (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Nimbus Concepts, LLC
Primary completion
Dec 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Patients With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Evidence of Tissue Ablation/Edema at Targeted Lumbar Medial Branches
100
PRIMARY
Volume of Lesions Were Recorded by the Reading Radiologists
602
PRIMARY
EMG Evidence of Lesion of the Targeted Medial Branches
88
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

Summary

The purpose of this study is to document the effectiveness of the Nimbus Multi-tined Expandable Electrode (MEE) Probe in carrying out the heating and ablation (cutting) of the small medial branch nerves that carry pain information from the facet joints. Subjects will be selected, by way of clinical evaluation and response to medial branch blocks, to undergo this procedure of radiofrequency ablation/neurotomies of the medial branches to the specific painful facet joints of the low back in order to relieve pain. This will be carried out with an FDA-approved device using a standard technique that has been accepted throughout the world. The difference in this study is that we will make use of MRIs to image the lesion that is produced and a special EMG study to look at the muscles in the back to document the effectiveness of the device in creating the intended lesion. No other study of this kind has been produced to look at this or any other radiofrequency device in the treatment of low back pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with a low back pain episode greater than three months in duration, unresponsive to non-interventional care, have had a lumbar MRI which is available for review, who have been selected to undergo lumbar medial branch RF lesioning and who have agreed to undergo pre and post procedure EMG and post procedure lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (LMRI).
  • Age 18 or greater
  • Appropriately selected patients using at least one set of diagnostic medial branch blocks

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to attend EMG, MRI assessments within the defined assessment time windows
  • Radicular pain or evidence of neurological compromise in the lower limbs (see clarification above - Target Population).
  • Those unable to read English and complete the informed consent process
  • Spondylolysis or lytic spondylolisthesis, degenerative spondylolisthesis which is Grade II+ or unstable.
  • Systemic inflammatory, toxic, corticosteroid induced or congenital myopathy, or inflammatory arthritis
  • Possible pregnancy or other reason that precludes the use of fluoroscopy, MRI, or EMG
  • Significant lumbar scoliosis (Cobb angle > 15 degrees).
  • Radicular/neurological deficits or focal disc herniation and/or stenosis, with correlating radicular symptoms (defined as pain or paresthesias below the knee; pain reproduction with straight leg raising; leg > back pain with extension/rotation maneuvers; radicular strength, reflex, or sensory changes consistent with their level of nerve root impingement).
  • Immunologically suppressed, or has received steroids at any dose daily for > 1 month within last 12 months
  • Currently involved in another study or treatment that may affect the outcome of this study
  • Evidence of spontaneous activity (denervation potentials) on baseline EMG
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02120625). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search