Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=40 Randomized Quadruple-blind Supportive Care

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine vs Intranasal Midazolam as Anxiolysis Prior to Pediatric Laceration Repair

Laceration · Anxiety
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02168439 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
40
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: mYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety — 23.3; 36.3 units on a scale
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked

No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.

Summary

The objective of this research study is to show superiority of intranasal dexmedetomidine to intranasal midazolam as anxiolysis prior to pediatric laceration repairs.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
mYPAS Score as Completed by Researchers to Assess Anxiety
23.3; 36.3
SECONDARY
mYPAS Scores at Other Time Points
48.8; 47.1; 42.5; 47.1; 23.3; 35.4
SECONDARY
VAS for Anxiety as Completed by Caregiver and Observer
3.8; 3.5; 1.7; 1.6; .7; 1.2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Presenting to Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • Laceration 5cm
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02168439). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search