N/A
N=4
Finding an Optimal Latency for Paired Associative Stimulation in People With Chronic Stroke
Stroke
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02188420 ↗Enrolled (actual)
4
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Cortical Excitability Using Single TMS Pulses — -.07667; 0.11; -.05667; .1233 Log10(microvolts)
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 3ms) (Device); Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 5ms) (Device); ranscranial Magnetic Stimulation will be applied to the primary motor cortex at the interstimulus interval of ("Latency" - 7ms) (Device); Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Time 100ms (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Minnesota
- Primary completion
- May 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in Cortical Excitability Using Single TMS Pulses |
-.07667; 0.11; -.05667; .1233 | — |
Summary
After a stroke, there is an exaggerated inhibitory influence from the non-stroke hemisphere to the stroke hemisphere. Brain stimulation using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the non-stroke hemisphere can decrease this inhibition. Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) may be a more effective way to produce this same inhibition, as shown in healthy subjects. However, it is not known whether this will translate to people with stroke. PAS consists of a peripheral nerve stimulus paired a short time later with a cortical stimulus to change the excitability within the brain. Thus the investigators will apply PAS to people with stroke, but the investigators need to first determine the most effective interpulse interval (IPI) between the peripheral and cortical stimuli. Our research question is which of three different IPIs is most effective in changing the excitability of the brain.
The purpose of this study is to determine the optimal IPI between a peripheral nerve pulse and a cortical stimulus that will be most effective in changing excitability of the brain in people with chronic stroke. The investigators hypothesize that the cortical excitability of the nonstroke hemisphere will be most inhibited with the latency-5ms condition.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) of greater than 6 months duration
- impairment in the paretic hand
- over 18 years old
- male or female
- on mini mental status exam must have score of 22 or higher
- must have elicitable motor evoked potential (MEP)
Exclusion Criteria
- seizure within the past two years
- receptive aphasia
- epileptogenic medication
- major psychiatric disorder
- other interfering comorbidities
- pregnancy
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02188420). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.