Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=68 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Comparison of Bacteriostatic Saline to Buffered Lidocaine for Ultrasound Guided Hip Joint Injection Local Anesthesia

Hip Pain

Enrolled (actual)
68
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration — 13.2; 14 score on a scale — p=0.82

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
bacteriostatic saline (Drug); buffered lidocaine (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Primary completion
Feb 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration
13.2; 14 0.82
SECONDARY
VAS for Pain Score During Subsequent Hip Joint Injection (Local Anesthetic Efficacy)
20.7; 15.6 0.21
SECONDARY
Anesthetic Infiltration Duration
33.3; 32.7 0.57

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare infiltration pain and anesthetic efficacy between lidocaine and Bacteriostatic saline (BS) for ultrasound (US) guided intraarticular hip injections.

Eligibility Criteria

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • age 18-75 years
  • referred for US-guided intraarticular hip injections in the Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinic, or Musculoskeletal Clinic

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

  • chronic opioid use
  • opioid use on day of procedure
  • history of fibromyalgia or other diffuse chronic pain syndrome
  • pain behavior during the clinical encounter as judged by the injectionist
  • anesthetic administration time outside the designated 5-15 second time frame
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02209272). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search