Phase 4
Completed N=68
Comparison of Bacteriostatic Saline to Buffered Lidocaine for Ultrasound Guided Hip Joint Injection Local Anesthesia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02209272 ↗Enrolled (actual)
68
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration — 13.2; 14 score on a scale — p=0.82
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked
No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare infiltration pain and anesthetic efficacy between lidocaine and Bacteriostatic saline (BS) for ultrasound (US) guided intraarticular hip injections.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY VAS for Pain Score During Local Anesthesia Infiltration |
13.2; 14 | 0.82 |
| SECONDARY VAS for Pain Score During Subsequent Hip Joint Injection (Local Anesthetic Efficacy) |
20.7; 15.6 | 0.21 |
| SECONDARY Anesthetic Infiltration Duration |
33.3; 32.7 | 0.57 |
Eligibility Criteria
INCLUSION CRITERIA
- age 18-75 years
- referred for US-guided intraarticular hip injections in the Mayo Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Clinic, or Musculoskeletal Clinic
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
- chronic opioid use
- opioid use on day of procedure
- history of fibromyalgia or other diffuse chronic pain syndrome
- pain behavior during the clinical encounter as judged by the injectionist
- anesthetic administration time outside the designated 5-15 second time frame
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02209272). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.