Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=57 Randomized Treatment

Regeneration of Liver: Portal Vein Embolization Versus Radiofrequency Assisted Ligation for Liver Hypertrophy (REBIRTH)

Liver Resection · Cancer

Enrolled (actual)
57
Serious AEs
10.0%
Results posted
Nov 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Changes in Liver Remnant Volume — 18.4; 80.7 percentage change

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation (RALPP) (Procedure); Portal vein embolization (PVE) (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Imperial College London
Primary completion
Apr 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Changes in Liver Remnant Volume
18.4; 80.7
SECONDARY
Postoperative Liver Function Tests
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Postoperative Complications (Dindo Clavien ≥Grade 3b)
1; 4

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare two different techniques (portal vein embolization and radiofrequency assisted liver partition with portal vein ligation) for increasing liver volume prior to major liver resection.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Any patient requiring right or extended right hepatectomy with FLRV less than 25% on preoperative volumetric study
  • WHO performance status 0, 1 or 2
  • Patient able to comply with protocol requirements and deemed fit for surgical resection
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Pregnancy
  • WHO status 3 or 4
  • New York Heart Association Classification Grade III or IV
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02216773). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search