Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=200 Randomized Treatment

Radiofrequency Ablation vs Laser Ablation of the Incompetent Greater Saphenous Vein

Chronic Venous Insufficiency

Enrolled (actual)
200
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Without Recurrent Clinical Symptoms of an Incompetent Greater Saphenous Vein After Treatment. — 79.3; 77.5 percentage of total participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Ablation of the Incompetent Greater Saphenous Vein (Procedure); ClosureFAST radiofrequency catheter (Device); EVLT 980nm diode laser system (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Virginia Commonwealth University
Primary completion
Aug 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Without Recurrent Clinical Symptoms of an Incompetent Greater Saphenous Vein After Treatment.
79.3; 77.5
SECONDARY
Incidence Rate of Acute Complications
0; 0

Summary

The aim of this study is to perform a randomized, prospective trial comparing the two current methods of treatment for chronic venous insufficiency, in an effort to evaluate complications and outcomes for each method, and ultimately, to see if one is superior to the other.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency.
  • Patients in whom endovenous thermal ablation is clinically indicate.
  • Have previously undergone at least 6 weeks of conservative treatment with compression stockings (unless they have venous ulcers, recurrent phlebitis, or bleeding varices).
  • Have venous disease that meets CEAP clinical class 2 through 6.
  • Have symptoms secondary to Greater Saphenous Vein insufficiency defined as reverse flow in the saphenous vein >0.5 seconds after calf compression or while standing.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Have previously undergone surgery, EVTA, or phlebectomy in that extremity (exclusive of spider vein injections or other cosmetic surface procedures).
  • Have a history of DVT.
  • Have a history of hypercoaguability disorder.
  • Are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Are nonambulatory.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02236338). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search