30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Chronic Venous Disease · Venous Insufficiency · Deep Venous Obstruction
Primary: Percentage Change of Haemodynamic Flow — 34.8; 62.8; 9; 14.8 % change
Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Mean Change (Reduction) From Baseline in Volume of Reference Leg at Week 16 — 1.13; 5.78 milliliters (mL) — p=0.531
Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Change in the Quality of Life as Measured by CIVIQ-20 — 12.2 score on a scale
Venous Insufficiency · Oedema · Varicose Veins
Primary: Venous Haemodynamics - Percent Change in Time Averaged Mean Velocity TAMV — 102.4; -9.1 percentage change — p=0.001
Venous Leg Ulcer
Primary: Change From Baseline in Wound Perimeter — 29.36; 43.64 mm
Trophic Ulcers · Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Number of Participants With Trophic Ulcer Healing — 11; 28 Participants
Chronic Venous Diseases
Primary: The Mean Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness Changes (mm) Between the Visit 3 and Baseline by Ultrasound Examination. — 2.5 mm
Coronary Heart Disease
Primary: Brachial Flow Velocity — 21.0 cm/sec
Vascular Malformations · Vascular Malformation Peripheral · Venous Malformation
Primary: Volume Difference of Malformation to Baseline (no Compression) While Wearing Compression Stockings Class I and II Determined by MRI — 16.38; 23.7 ml
Varicose Ulcer
Primary: Identification of Biomarkers Predictive of Ulcer Healing. — 9 Number of biomarkers
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Primary: Walking Endurance — -14; 35 Meters
Venous Leg Ulcer · Chronic Venous Insufficiency · Venous Stasis Ulcer
Primary: Number of Participants Who Agreed With Tolerance and Comfort Questionnaire Items After Using a Dual Action Pneumatic Compression Device — 12; 8; 9; 15 Participants
Deep Vein Thrombosis · Post-thrombotic Syndrome
Primary: Change From Baseline in Villalta Score at Day 30 Post-EkoSonic® Study Treatment Procedure — 15.5; -5.9 units on a scale
Lymphedema
Primary: Median Time to Wound Closure at 9 Months — 141; 211 median number of days for complete heali
Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Vein Occlusion Rate — 29; 0; 0 limbs
Varicose Veins
Primary: Change in Patient-reported Symptoms of Varicose Veins (VVSymQ Score) — 2.13; 4.63; 5.68; 4.87 units on a scale — p==0.0001
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression
Primary: IPC(on) Peak Velocity Change From Baseline — 6.2 cm/s
Varicose Veins · Venous Stasis · Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Venous Haemodynamics - Percent Change in Time Averaged Mean Velocity TAMV — 3.36; 26.58; 39.49; 0.46 percentage change from device off
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis
Primary: 2-year Change in Villalta Score — -1.5; -0.5 units on a scale — p=0.34
Venous Leg Ulcers
Primary: Percentage Wound Area Change — 78.9; 65.4 percentage wound area reduction
Venous Thromboembolism · Venous Thrombosis
Primary: Number of Patients With Asymptomatic Venous Thrombosis of Lower Limbs as Detected by Duplex Ultrasound — 1; 34 Participants — p=<0.001
Venous Leg Ulcer
Primary: Time to Ulcer Healing From Date of Randomisation to Date of Healing up to 365 Days — 82; 56 days
Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Primary Effectiveness Objective — 53; 66 Treated IPVs
Chronic Venous Disease
Primary: Dynamics of the Main Veno-specific Symptoms, Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Visit 0 vs Visit4 — 53.8; 15.6; 42.4; 11.2 mm
Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction
Primary: Primary Patency — 162 Participants — p=<0.0001
Varicose Veins
Primary: Change in Patient-Reported Symptoms of Varicose Veins (VVSymQ Score) — -2.00; -5.34; -6.01; -5.06 units on a scale — p=<0.0001
Great Saphenous Vein Incompetence · Visible Varicosities
Primary: Absolute Change From Baseline in Independent Photography Review (IPR-V3 Score) — -0.80; -1.30; -1.11 score
Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Safety: AEs, SAEs, ADEs, SADEs, UADEs — 0; 0; 0; 0 Events
Venous Insufficiency · Venous Reflux · Lower Extremity Ulcer
Primary: Wound Area Mean Percent Reduction — 45.8; 61.6 percentage of mean area reduction — p=<0.024
Chronic Venous Insufficiency
Primary: Ease of Use and Comfort for Subjects Using the ACTitouch System. — 70.8; 37.5; 89.2; 59.4 Percent of participants