Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=28 Randomized Double-blind

Clinical Evaluation of Opti-Free III (FID 109182) Compared to Opti-Free Plus® in Japan

Corneal Staining

Enrolled (actual)
28
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Participants Scoring ≥ 2 for Corneal Staining Density With Fluorescein — 92.6; 22.2 percentage of participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
FID 109182 (Device); Opti-Free Plus (Device); Senofilcon A contact lens (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 20+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Alcon Research
Primary completion
May 2014

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Participants Scoring ≥ 2 for Corneal Staining Density With Fluorescein
92.6; 22.2
SECONDARY
Proportion of Participants Scoring ≥ 2 for Corneal Staining Area With Fluorescein
92.6; 44.4

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare an investigational contact lens care product (FID 109182) to a commercially available contact lens product (Opti-Free Plus®) for corneal staining when used with Acuvue® Oasys® contact lenses. The contact lenses will be pre-soaked in the products for 24-48 hours prior to a 2-hour contralateral wear period.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Soft contact lenses habitual wearer, both eyes.
  • Voluntarily sign Informed Consent.
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to tolerate the ingredients in Opti-Free® and similar contact lens care products.
  • Potential use of eye drops during the study, including over-the-counter products, except for artificial tear eye drops.
  • Eye infection, blepharitis, iris inflammation, or severe eye inflammation.
  • Corneal staining greater than Grade 1 at baseline.
  • Pregnant, lactating, or intend to become pregnant during study period.
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02251561). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search