Phase 3
Completed N=308
A Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Semaglutide Once Weekly Versus Sitagliptin Once Daily in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02254291 ↗Enrolled (actual)
308
Serious AEs
3.3%
Results posted
Sep 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) — 228; 197; 186 Number of events
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
121citations · ~15 / year
Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes.
Summary
This trial is conducted in Japan. The purpose is to compare the safety of once-weekly dosing of semaglutide (0.5 and 1.0 mg) versus sitagliptin (100 mg) once daily, both as monotherapy during 30 weeks of treatment in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Linked Publications (2)
-
Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes.
-
Effects of semaglutide on risk of cardiovascular events across a continuum of cardiovascular risk: combined post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN and PIONEER trials.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) |
228; 197; 186 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Severe or Blood Glucose (BG) Confirmed Symptomatic Hypoglycaemic Episodes |
0; 1; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) |
-1.87; -2.18; -0.74 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female, age 20 years or older at the time of signing informed consent
- Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between 6.5% and 9.5% (48-80 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) for subjects treated with oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) monotherapy and between 7.0% and 10.5% (53-91 mmol/mol) (both inclusive) for subjects treated with diet and exercise therapy at screening
- Japanese subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who are: a) on stable OAD monotherapy at a half-maximum dose or below according to the approved Japanese labelling in addition to diet and exercise therapy for at least 30 days prior to screening (week -8) (For metformin only: the maximum dose of 750 mg/day is allowed except for METGLUCO®. For METGLUCO®, the allowable half-max dose of 1125 mg/day must be applied.). 'Stable' is defined as unchanged medication and unchanged dose, or b) on stable diet and exercise therapy for at least 30 days prior to screening (week -2)
Exclusion Criteria
- Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (e.g. abstinence, diaphragm, condom [by the partner], intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives) throughout the trial including the 5-week follow-up period
- Treatment with once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists within 90 days prior to screening
- Treatment with any glucose lowering agent(s) (except for pre-trial OAD for subject treated with OAD monotherapy) in a period of 60 days prior to screening. An exception is short-term treatment (7 days or less in total) with insulin in connection with inter-current illness
- Any disorder which, in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardise subject's safety or compliance with the protocol
- History of chronic or idiopathic acute pancreatitis
- Screening calcitonin value of 50 ng/L (pg/mL) or greater
- Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN2)
- Impaired renal function defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 ml/min/1.73 m^2 per modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula (4 variable version)
- Acute coronary or cerebrovascular event within 90 days before randomisation
- Heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02254291) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.