Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=93

Study of Lacosamide as an Adjunctive Drug Treatment for Epilepsy in Patients With Brain Tumors

Brain Tumor Related Epilepsy (BTRE)

Enrolled (actual)
93
Serious AEs
5.4%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Patients With Response at the End of the 6-month Observation Period — 76.7 percentage of patients

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
Primary completion
Dec 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Patients With Response at the End of the 6-month Observation Period
76.7
PRIMARY
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Rating at Visit 3
49; 17; 10
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients With Retention on Lacosamide (LCM) at the End of the 6-month Observation Period
63.4
SECONDARY
Time to Discontinuation of Lacosamide (LCM) Treatment From the Date of First Dose of LCM
NA
SECONDARY
Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
1.3
SECONDARY
Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the 5 Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment (EQ-5D-5L) Change in Utility as Converted From the 5 Dimensions
-0.01
SECONDARY
Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory - Brain Tumor (MDASI-BT)
0.1; -0.1; 0.0; -0.5
SECONDARY
Actual Change From Visit 1 (Baseline) to Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period) in Seizure Frequency (Seizures Per 28 Days)
-2.9
SECONDARY
Percentage Change From Baseline in Seizure Frequency
-85.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Patients With Seizure-free Status (Yes/No) at the End of the 6-month Observational Period
34.9
SECONDARY
Discontinuation Rate of Lacosamide (LCM) Due to Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
5
SECONDARY
Discontinuation Rate of Lacosamide (LCM) Due to Lack of Effectiveness
7
SECONDARY
Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) Rating at Visit 3 (Month 6 or End of Observation Period)
52; 19; 10

Summary

This study is being conducted to find out whether lacosamide (a drug to treat epilepsy) is effective in routine clinical practice for patients with epilepsy caused by a brain tumor.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patient has never been treated with lacosamide (LCM) prior to this non-interventional study (NIS) or treatment with LCM for the first time started no earlier than 7 days prior to enrollment in this NIS
  • The decision by the treating physician to prescribe LCM falls within current standard clinical practice, and the treatment decision is clearly separated from the decision to consider inclusion of the patient in the NIS
  • A Patient Data Consent form is signed and dated by the patient and/or by the parent(s) or legal representative
  • Patient is a male or female ≥ 16 years of age
  • Patient must have a diagnosis of brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) secondary to low-grade glioma (World Health Organization Grade 1 to 2 at time of enrollment)
  • Patient has a retrospective Baseline seizure frequency of at least 1 partial-onset seizure in the 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 (enrollment/ Baseline visit)
  • Patient does not have a previous diagnosis of epilepsy before tumor onset
  • Patient does not have brain metastases
  • Patient has a Karnofsky performance status scale index ≥ 60 %
  • Patient is currently taking only 1-2 Baseline anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy, other than LCM
  • Patient has received a maximum of 4 different lifetime AEDs ever before entering the NIS

Exclusion Criteria

  • N/A
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02276053). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search