Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=243 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab Added to MTX in Japanese Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (SARIL-RA-KAKEHASI)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02293902 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
243
Serious AEs
7.6%
Results posted
Jan 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24 — 14.8; 67.9; 57.5 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Established
46citations · ~7 / year
Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial in Japan.
Arthritis research & therapy · 2019 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

Primary Objective: -To demonstrate that sarilumab added to methotrexate (MTX) reduce signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in Japanese RA participants with an inadequate response to MTX. Secondary Objective: -To assess the safety of sarilumab added to MTX in Japanese RA participants with an inadequate response to MTX.

Linked Publications (2)

  • Sarilumab plus methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial in Japan.
    Arthritis research & therapy · 2019 · 46 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Haemoglobin changes and disease activity in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with sarilumab.
    Clinical and experimental rheumatology · 2023 · 2 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response at Week 24
14.8; 67.9; 57.5 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
49; 76; 71; 12; 13; 54
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities
2; 4; 1; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
6; 9; 5; 0; 2; 6
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Hematological Parameters
9; 4; 5; 0; 1; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Metabolic Parameters
0; 0; 2; 1; 1; 2
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Electrolytes
0; 0; 1; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Renal Function Parameters
0; 1; 1; 0; 1; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities: Liver Function Parameters
3; 17; 24; 3; 6; 16

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of RA, according to the American College of Rheumatology/The European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 Rheumatoid Arthritis Classification Criteria with >=3 months disease duration.
  • Moderately to severely active RA defined as:
  • At least 8 of 68 tender joints and 6 of 66 swollen joints at screening visit.
  • High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) >=6mg/L at screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

  • Participants 75 years of age.
  • Treatment with any Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) other than MTX or biologic agent without the appropriate off-drug period prior to screening.
  • Prior treatment with anti-interleukin-6 (anti-IL-6) or anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antagonist therapies, including but not limited to tocilizumab or sarilumab.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02293902) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search