Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=50 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

FARE Peanut SLIT and Early Tolerance Induction

Peanut Hypersensitivity · Food Allergy · Food Hypersensitivity · Peanut Allergy

Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
2.0%
Results posted
Dec 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Desensitization After 36 Months of Peanut SLIT or Placebo SLIT — 4.9; 2.5 score on a scale — p=0.002

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Liquid Peanut Extract (Drug); Placebo Glycerin SLIT (Drug)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Primary completion
Dec 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Desensitization After 36 Months of Peanut SLIT or Placebo SLIT
4.9; 2.5 0.002 sig
SECONDARY
Tolerance 3 Months After Discontinuing Peanut SLIT or Placebo SLIT
4.0; 1.0 0.0005 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Immune Parameters With Peanut SLIT Versus Placebo SLIT (Peanut-specific IgE)
-19.4; 65.2 0.007 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Immune Parameters With Peanut SLIT Versus Placebo SLIT (Peanut-specific IgG4)
3.9; -0.2 0.01 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Immune Parameters With Peanut SLIT Versus Placebo SLIT (Peanut Skin Prick Test)
-7.7; 1.8 <0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events With Peanut SLIT Versus Placebo SLIT
0; 1 0.3

Summary

Primary Objective: To determine if 36 months of peanut SLIT as an early intervention in subjects ages 1 to 4 years induces clinical desensitization. The primary outcome of this objective will be a statistically significant difference in challenge scores between the treatment group versus the placebo group during DBPCFC (Double blind placebo controlled food challenge) performed after 36 months of peanut SLIT (desensitization). Challenge scores are measured by the amount of peanut protein participants are able to ingest successfully without symptoms of an allergic reaction. [Time Frame: Baseline, 36 months] Secondary Objectives: A secondary outcome of this objective will be a statistically significant difference in the challenge score of the treatment group versus the placebo group during the DBPCFC performed 3 months after discontinuing therapy (tolerance). To examine the change in immune parameters associated with peanut SLIT and the development of clinical tolerance. Through this objective, the investigators will seek to understand the molecular processes by which SLIT affects the immune system through evaluation of immune mechanisms in relationship to clinical findings of desensitization and tolerance. The investigators will delineate the impact of peanut SLIT on the subsequent cellular and humoral responses to peanut protein. [Time Frame: Baseline, 39 months]

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Written informed consent from participant's parent/guardian.
  • Age 12-48 months of either sex, any race, any ethnicity.
  • A peanut allergy diagnosis with a convincing clinical history of peanut allergy and a serum peanut-specific IgE [UniCAP] > 0.35 kUA/L AND a positive skin prick test to peanut (>3 mm than the negative control) OR are sensitized to peanut (based on a serum IgE [UniCAP] to peanut of > 5 kUA/L) AND a positive skin prick test to peanut (> 3 mm than the negative control) and no known history of ingestion of peanut.
  • A positive DBPCFC to 1000 mg of peanut at enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of severe anaphylaxis to peanut, defined as hypoxia, hypotension, or neurologic compromise (cyanosis or peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 92% at any stage, hypotension, confusion, collapse or loss of consciousness).
  • Participation in any interventional study for the treatment of food allergy in the past 6 months.
  • Known oat, wheat, or glycerin allergy.
  • Eosinophilic or other inflammatory (e.g. celiac) gastrointestinal disease.
  • Severe asthma (2007 NHLBI Criteria Steps 5 or 6 - Appendix 2).
  • Inability to discontinue antihistamines for skin testing and DBPCFCs.
  • Use of omalizumab or other non-traditional forms of allergen immunotherapy (e.g., oral or sublingual) or immunomodulator therapy (not including corticosteroids) or biologic therapy within the past year.
  • Use of beta-blockers (oral), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) or calcium channel blockers.
  • Significant medical condition (e.g., liver, kidney, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hematologic, or pulmonary disease) which would make the subject unsuitable for induction of food reactions.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02304991). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search