Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 Completed N=519 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to Methotrexate (MTX) Treatment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02305849 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
519
Serious AEs
3.1%
Results posted
Aug 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12 — 21.8; 58.6; 64.4 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
129citations · ~18 / year
Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan.
Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2019 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The objective of this study was to verify the efficacy of ASP015K versus placebo administrated in combination with methotrexate (MTX) over placebo in terms of efficacy in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to MTX

Linked Publications (5)

  • Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan.
    Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2019 · 129 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Patient- and physician-reported outcomes from two phase 3 randomized studies (RAJ3 and RAJ4) of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Arthritis research & therapy · 2021 · 10 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Population pharmacokinetic analysis of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2021 · 9 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Post hoc analysis of clinical characteristics of patients with radiographic progression in a Japanese phase 3 trial of peficitinib and methotrexate treatment (RAJ4).
    Modern rheumatology · 2023 · 6 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Exposure-response modeling of peficitinib efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2021 · 1 citation · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12
21.8; 58.6; 64.4 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in mTSS at Week 28
3.37; 1.62; 1.03 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR20-CRP Response Through Week 52
38.2; 48.2; 8.1; 2.7; 38.5; 14.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response at Week 12
7.6; 29.9; 46.0 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response Through Week 52
10.0; 15.9; 2.7; 0.0; 10.3; 0.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response at Week 12
2.4; 12.1; 23.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response Through Week 52
1.2; 4.1; 0.0; 0.0; 2.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in mTSS at Week 52
6.27; 2.12; 1.54 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in JSN Score at Week 28 and Week 52
1.90; 0.99; 0.82; 3.55; 1.30; 1.19 0.018 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Erosion Score at Week 28 and Week 52
1.35; 0.63; 0.18; 2.52; 0.82; 0.32 0.036 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Change From Baseline in mTSS <= 0.5 at Week 28 and Week 52
45.8; 67.1; 72.6; 42.5; 64.0; 68.9 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP at Week 12
-0.51; -1.70; -2.09 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
-1.11; -1.39; -0.28; -0.30; -0.82; -0.74
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR at Week 12
-0.51; -1.66; -2.12 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Score Through Week 52
-1.07; -1.37; -0.26; -0.26; -0.87; -0.67
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) at Week 12
-2.1; -6.9; -9.1 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) Through Week 52
-5.1; -6.3; -6.8; -8.3; -7.1; -9.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SJC (66 Joints) at Week 12
-2.2; -5.9; -7.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SJC (66 Joints) Through Week 52
-4.3; -5.3; -5.6; -7.1; -6.0; -7.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Score < 2.6 at Week 12
7.7; 31.4; 35.1 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Score < 2.6 Through Week 52
11.2; 14.7; 0.0; 0.0; 15.4; 5.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Score < 2.6 at Week 12
2.4; 12.8; 19.3 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Score < 2.6 Through Week 52
4.1; 5.9; 0.0; 0.0; 2.6; 0.0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Score <= 3.2 at Week 12
12.4; 47.1; 57.9 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP Score <= 3.2 Through Week 52
22.4; 24.1; 36.3; 44.0; 47.0; 59.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Score <= 3.2 at Week 12
4.7; 25.0; 36.3 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR Score <= 3.2 Through Week 52
10.6; 12.9; 17.9; 29.5; 25.6; 37.3
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 12
-0.001; -1.499; -1.421 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in CRP Through Week 52
-1.055; -1.411; -1.207; -1.569; -1.532; -1.458
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 12
-2.42; -18.90; -22.17 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in ESR Through Week 52
-11.09; -16.59; -14.96; -21.10; -19.14; -22.92
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
10.1; 43.0; 55.6 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
19.4; 21.8; 30.4; 41.0; 42.9; 57.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12
35.5; 77.9; 84.8 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52
67.1; 77.1; 73.8; 80.1; 78.6; 85.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
4.1; 23.8; 34.5 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
7.6; 12.4; 16.1; 28.3; 24.4; 35.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good or Moderate Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12
32.0; 74.4; 78.9 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good or Moderate Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52
55.9; 68.2; 72.0; 76.5; 75.0; 80.1
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission at Week 12
0.6; 5.8; 9.9 0.011 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission Through Week 52
1.2; 1.2; 1.2; 3.6; 6.0; 10.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission <=3.3 at Week 12
0.6; 7.0; 14.0 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Achieving SDAI Remission Score <=3.3 Through Week 52
1.2; 2.4; 3.0; 8.4; 7.1; 14.5
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 12
-4.90; -15.66; -19.57 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Through Week 52
-11.02; -13.79; -14.60; -18.36; -15.94; -20.08
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in PGA at Week 12
-11.88; -28.83; -35.96 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in PGA Through Week 52
-18.36; -22.94; -25.79; -31.54; -29.07; -36.55
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SGA at Week 12
-7.11; -21.09; -26.57 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SGA Through Week 52
-13.80; -17.59; -19.11; -24.97; -21.59; -27.40
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SGAP at Week 12
-6.64; -21.09; -26.87 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SGAP Through Week 52
-12.94; -16.18; -19.10; -24.98; -21.27; -27.81
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy
10; 6; 3; 9
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12
0.01; -0.22; -0.37 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Through Week 52
-0.08; -0.21; -0.18; -0.32; -0.23; -0.38
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey - 36 Questions, Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score at Week 12
0.57; 6.60; 9.02 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary Score Through Week 52
3.84; 5.77; 4.92; 7.91; 6.68; 9.32
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score at Week 12
1.07; 3.28; 2.50 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score Through Week 52
1.45; 1.33; 2.72; 2.44; 3.44; 2.67
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score at Week 12
-0.09; 2.30; 3.90 0.099
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score Through Week 52
1.41; 1.70; 2.50; 3.30; 2.32; 3.92
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) Percent Work Time Missed at Week 12
-0.82; 0.36; -1.46 0.879
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Work Time Missed Through Week 52
-0.90; 0.02; -1.48; -1.73; -0.70; -1.97
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working at Week 12
-2.42; -11.71; -15.96 0.007 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working Through Week 52
-10.00; -6.56; -12.50; -13.98; -11.97; -16.29
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment at Week 12
-2.75; -11.58; -16.91 0.010 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Overall Work Impairment Through Week 52
-10.61; -7.51; -13.13; -14.67; -12.15; -17.15
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment at Week 12
-2.50; -13.98; -19.35 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment Through Week 52
-9.23; -10.65; -13.07; -17.44; -13.71; -19.88
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the First 12 Weeks
84; 89; 104; 47; 57; 80
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With TEAEs From Week 12 to Week 28
50; 95; 104; 21; 25; 27
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With TEAEs From Week 28 to Week 52
114; 112; 22; 27; 25; 26

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject has RA of 15 IU/mL

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject has received a biologic DMARD within the specified period
  • Inadequate responders to biologic DMARD as determined by investigator/sub-investigator
  • Subject has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular or endorectal (excluding suppositories for anal diseases) corticosteroid within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has participated in any study of ASP015K and has received ASP015K or placebo
  • Subject has received other investigational drugs within 90 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to baseline
  • Subject has received plasma exchange therapy within 60 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone joint drainage, has received local anesthesia and nerve block, or has received articular cartilage protectant at the assessed joint within 28 days prior to baseline
  • Subject has undergone surgery and has residual effects in the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator, or is scheduled to undergo surgery that may affect the study evaluation of the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator
  • A diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.) other than RA
  • Any of the following laboratory values at screening:
  • Hemoglobin < 9.0 g/dL
  • Absolute neutrophil count < 1000/μL
  • Absolute lymphocyte count < 800/μL
  • Platelet count < 75000/μL
  • ALT ≥ 2 ×ULN
  • AST ≥ 2 × ULN
  • Total bilirubin (TBL) ≥ 1.5 × ULN
  • Estimated GFR ≤ 40 mL/min as measured by the MDRD method
  • β-D-glucan ≥ 11 pg/mL
  • Positive HBs antigen, HBc antibody, HBs antibody or HBV-DNA quantitation (However, subject with negative HBs antigen and HBV-DNA quantitation, and positive HBc antibody and/or HBs antibody is eligible if HBV-DNA is monitored by HBV-DNA quantitation at every scheduled visit after initiation of study drug administration.)
  • Positive HCV antibody
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent active tuberculosis (TB)
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent interstitial pneumonia and investigator/sub-investigator judges that it is inappropriate for the subject to participate in this study
  • Subject has a history of or concurrent malignant tumor (except for successfully treated basal cell carcinoma)
  • Subject has received live or live attenuated virus vaccination within 56 days prior to baseline. (Inactivated vaccines including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are allowed.)
  • Subject has any ongoing severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, infectious, or autoimmune disease except for RA (excluding Sjogren's syndrome and chronic thyroiditis), or any ongoing illness which would make the subject unsuitable for the study as determined by the investigator/sub-investigator
  • Subject has a history of clinically significant allergy. (Clinically significant allergy includes allergies such as systemic urticaria induced by specific antigens and drugs, anaphylaxis, and allergy associated with shock necessitating hospitalized treatment.)
  • Subject has concurrent cardiac failure, defined as NYHA classification Class III or higher, or a history of it
  • Subject has concurrent prolonged QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has prolonged QT interval (defined as QTc ≥ 500 msec. Subject has QTc ≥ 500 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening
  • Subject has a history of positive HIV infection
  • Subject has congenital short QT syndrome or a history of it. Subject has shortened QT interval (defined as QTc < 330 msec. Subject has QTc < 330 msec at retest will be excluded) at screening.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02305849) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search