Phase 3
Completed N=509
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of ASP015K in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Had an Inadequate Response to DMARDs
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02308163 ↗Enrolled (actual)
509
Serious AEs
4.8%
Results posted
Mar 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12 — 30.7; 57.7; 74.5; 83.5 Percentage of Participants — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
107citations · ~15 / year
Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3).
Summary
The objective of this study was to verify the superiority of ASP015K alone or in combination with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) over placebo in terms of efficacy in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to DMARDs
Linked Publications (4)
-
Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3).
-
Patient- and physician-reported outcomes from two phase 3 randomized studies (RAJ3 and RAJ4) of peficitinib (ASP015K) in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
-
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of peficitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
-
Exposure-response modeling of peficitinib efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Response at Week 12 |
30.7; 57.7; 74.5; 83.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With an ACR20-CRP Response Through Week 52 |
43.9; 45.0; 21.4; 19.1; 61.0; 51.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50)-CRP Response at Week 12 |
8.9; 30.8; 42.2; 52.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With an ACR50-CRP Response Through Week 52 |
8.2; 14.0; 4.8; 2.1; 29.5; 25.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70)-CRP Response at Week 12 |
1.0; 13.5; 27.5; 30.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With an ACR70-CRP Response Through Week 52 |
1.0; 2.0; 0.0; 0.0; 14.5; 11.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28-CRP at Week 12 |
-0.64; -1.62; -2.17; -2.42 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline DAS28-CRP Through Week 52 |
-1.11; -1.29; -0.49; -0.56; -1.89; -1.48 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in DAS28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 12 |
-0.62; -1.60; -2.24; -2.51 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR Through Week 52 |
-1.13; -1.26; -0.46; -0.63; -1.90; -1.50 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) at Week 12 |
-4.3; -8.2; -9.9; -10.7 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in TJC (68 Joints) Through Week 52 |
-5.9; -5.4; -3.9; -4.3; -8.3; -7.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) (66 Joints) at Week 12 |
-3.2; -6.0; -8.4; -8.3 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SJC (66 Joints) Through Week 52 |
-4.5; -4.7; -2.5; -2.2; -6.3; -5.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 at Week 12 |
5.0; 24.5; 34.7; 45.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP < 2.6 Through Week 52 |
10.2; 5.0; 0.0; 2.1; 26.0; 19.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 at Week 12 |
1.0; 11.7; 17.8; 31.7 | 0.003 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR < 2.6 Through Week 52 |
2.0; 4.0; 0.0; 2.1; 14.5; 8.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 at Week 12 |
11.0; 40.2; 53.5; 68.0 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-CRP <= 3.2 Through Week 52 |
18.4; 21.0; 4.7; 4.3; 47.0; 32.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 at Week 12 |
7.0; 19.4; 37.6; 49.7 | 0.012 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving DAS28-ESR <= 3.2 Through Week 52 |
9.2; 10.0; 0.0; 4.3; 33.0; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in CRP at Week 12 |
0.022; -1.056; -1.734; -1.207 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in CRP Through Week 52 |
-0.817; -1.359; 0.013; 0.073; -1.360; -0.967 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in ESR at Week 12 |
-1.96; -12.96; -23.92; -20.92 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in ESR Through Week 52 |
-9.98; -14.99; -0.63; -3.87; -19.20; -15.27 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Good Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12 |
9.1; 38.6; 51.5; 65.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a EULAR Good Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52 |
17.3; 16.0; 4.8; 2.1; 44.5; 28.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP at Week 12 |
41.4; 75.2; 92.1; 92.5 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-CRP Through Week 52 |
63.3; 72.0; 31.0; 40.4; 87.5; 76.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12 |
5.1; 18.6; 36.6; 49.0 | 0.006 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52 |
8.2; 10.0; 0.0; 2.2; 31.7; 16.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR at Week 12 |
37.8; 69.6; 88.1; 90.9 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With a Good or Moderate EULAR Response Using DAS28-ESR Through Week 52 |
56.1; 65.0; 31.0; 23.9; 81.9; 66.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission at Week 12 |
2.0; 5.9; 5.9; 13.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR / EULAR Remission Through Week 52 |
1.0; 0.0; 0.0; 0.0; 7.0; 2.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Remission at Week 12 |
0.0; 8.8; 8.9; 18.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving SDAI Remission Through Week 52 |
1.0; 1.0; 0.0; 0.0; 10.0; 4.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SDAI Score at Week 12 |
-7.22; -16.08; -20.93; -21.94 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SDAI Score Through Week 52 |
-11.83; -12.78; -5.57; -7.21; -17.09; -14.71 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score <= 2.8 at Week 12 |
0.0; 8.7; 9.9; 19.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants Achieving CDAI Score <= 2.8 Through Week 52 |
1.0; 2.0; 0.0; 0.0; 9.0; 4.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in CDAI Score at Week 12 |
-7.25; -14.91; -19.20; -20.74 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in CDAI Score Through Week 52 |
-11.01; -11.42; -5.61; -7.28; -15.73; -13.74 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis (PGA) at Week 12 |
-13.94; -27.69; -34.65; -37.40 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in PGA Through Week 52 |
-18.71; -19.49; -8.77; -12.37; -27.48; -25.92 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Subject's SGA at Week 12 |
-7.87; -23.74; -31.59; -32.43 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SGA Through Week 52 |
-14.66; -18.30; -1.83; -6.59; -24.38; -21.29 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain at Week 12 |
-6.64; -23.78; -30.65; -30.82 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Subject's Assessment of Pain Through Week 52 |
-14.80; -18.36; -2.00; -8.23; -22.24; -22.45 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy |
7; 1; 1; 1 | 0.033 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 12 |
0.03; -0.28; -0.37; -0.39 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Through Week 52 |
-0.10; -0.19; -0.04; 0.01; -0.24; -0.25 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey - 36 Questions, Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical Component Summary Score at Week 12 |
1.95; 8.36; 8.81; 8.53 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Physical Component Summary Score Through Week 52 |
3.82; 3.20; 6.10; 6.43; 6.78; 7.35 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score at Week 12 |
0.00; 2.70; 3.69; 3.23 | 0.004 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Mental Component Summary Score Through Week 52 |
1.53; 1.72; 2.85; 2.91; 3.55; 3.56 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score at Week 12 |
0.17; 1.24; 7.04; 7.16 | 0.210 |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in SF-36v2 Role/Social Component Summary Score Through Week 52 |
0.40; 4.27; 4.06; 3.80; 5.96; 6.51 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI) Percent Work Time Missed at Week 12 |
6.78; -2.14; -6.80; -5.60 | 0.027 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Work Time Missed Through Week 52 |
-0.56; -6.35; -3.71; -2.38; -6.10; -4.33 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working at Week 12 |
4.13; -13.04; -16.12; -24.43 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Impairment While Working Through Week 52 |
-6.42; -6.46; -18.33; -14.31; -15.42; -20.52 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in Percent Overall Work Impairment at Week 12 |
3.62; -12.20; -18.68; -24.68 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Overall Work Impairment Through Week 52 |
-5.72; -8.67; -18.20; -14.16; -17.44; -20.94 | — |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment at Week 12 |
-4.65; -19.61; -24.65; -26.40 | <0.001 sig |
| SECONDARY Change From Baseline in WPAI Percent Activity Impairment Through Week 52 |
-10.92; -11.30; -17.90; -20.10; -23.64; -25.33 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events During the First 12 Weeks |
54; 49; 55; 119; 29; 33 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events From Week 12 |
78; 79; 41; 37; 156; 50 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Subject has RA diagnosed according to the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria or the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria
- Subject who did not receive the following drugs, or received the drugs with stable dosage for at least 28 days prior to the baseline (start of treatment) for RA treatment:
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; excluding topical formulations), oral morphine or equivalent opioid analgesics (≤ 30 mg/day), acetaminophen, or oral corticosteroids (≤ 10 mg/day in prednisolone equivalent)
- At screening subject has active RA as evidenced by both of the following:
- ≥ 6 tender/painful joints (using 68-joint assessment)
- ≥ 6 swollen joints (using 66-joint assessment)
- CRP > 0.50 mg/dL at screening
- Subject meets the ACR 1991 Revised Criteria for the Classification of Global Functional Status in RA Class I, II or, III at screening.
- Inadequate responder to (including subjects who were intolerant of) at least one DMARD administered for at least 90 days prior to screening
Exclusion Criteria
- Subject has received a biologic DMARD within the specified period
- Subject has received etanercept
- Inadequate responder to at least 3 biologic DMARDs as determined by investigator/sub-investigator
- Subject has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular or endorectal (excluding suppositories for anal diseases) corticosteroid within 28 days prior to baseline
- Subject has participated in any study of ASP015K and has received ASP015K or placebo
- Subject has received other investigational drugs within 90 days or within 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, prior to baseline
- Subject has received plasma exchange therapy within 60 days prior to baseline
- Subject has undergone joint drainage, has received local anesthesia and nerve block, or has received articular cartilage protectant at the assessed joint within 28 days prior to baseline
- Subject has undergone surgery and has residual effects in the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator, or is scheduled to undergo surgery that may affect the study evaluation of the assessed joints at the discretion of investigator/sub-investigator
- A diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis (psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, SLE, sarcoidosis, etc.) other than RA
- Any of the following laboratory values at screening:
- Hemoglobin ULN [in case of Japan: ≥ 11 pg/mL]
- Positive HBs antigen, HBc antibody, HBs antibody or HBV-DNA quantitation (However, subject with negative HBs antigen and HBV-DNA quantitation, and positive HBc antibody and/or HBs antibody is eligible if HBV-DNA is monitored by HBV-DNA quantitation at every scheduled visit after initiation of study drug or reference drug administration.)
- Positive HCV antibody
- Subject has a history of or concurrent active tuberculosis (TB)
- Subject has a history of or concurrent interstitial pneumonia and investigator/sub-investigator judges that it is inappropriate for the subject to participate in this study
- Subject has a history of or concurrent malignant tumor (except for successfully treated basal cell carcinoma)
- Subject has received live or live attenuated virus vaccination within 56 days prior to baseline. (Inactivated vaccines including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines are allowed.)
- Subject has a history of or concurrent demyelinating disorders
- Subject has any ongoing severe, progressive, or uncontrolled renal, hepatic, hematological, gastrointestinal, metabolic, endocrine, pulmonary, cardiac, neurological, infectious, or autoimmune disease except for RA (excluding Sjogren's syndrome and chronic thyroiditis), or any ongoing illness which would make the subject unsuitable for the study as determined by the investigator/sub-investigator
- Subject has a history of clinically significant allergy. (Clinically significant allergy includes allergies such as systemic urticaria
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02308163) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.