Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=38 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Unmodulated 5 Kilohertz Currents Versus TENS: Effect on Pain Thresholds, Tactile Threshold, and Nerve Conduction

Pain

Enrolled (actual)
38
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Mechanical Pain Threshold During Treatment — 57.5; 63.2; 53.8 N — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
5 KHz (Device); TENS (Device); Sham stimulation (Device)
Age
Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Castilla-La Mancha
Primary completion
Jan 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mechanical Pain Threshold During Treatment
57.5; 63.2; 53.8 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Thermal Pain Threshold During Treatment
57.48; 63.16; 53.82 0.04 sig
PRIMARY
Nerve Conduction Latency Immediately After Treatment
3.71; 3.68; 3.63 0.9
PRIMARY
Tactile Threshold During Treatment
18.3; 74.5; 1.1 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Habituation to Electrical Stimulation
7.7; 5.5 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Perception Current Comfortability
26; 12 0.023 sig
SECONDARY
Change Current Density (mA/cm2)
0.62; 0.44 0.003 sig
SECONDARY
Change From Baseline in Nerve Conduction Amplitude ( µV)
-0.09; 0.03; -0.4 0.8
SECONDARY
Baseline Mechanical Pain Threshold
48.4; 48.3; 54.0 0.02 sig
SECONDARY
Mechanical Pain Threshold Post-treatment 20 Min.
53.8; 55.2; 51.5 0.4
SECONDARY
Mechanical Pain Threshold Post-treatment 40 Min.
52.0; 52.6; 51.0 0.8
SECONDARY
Baseline Thermal Pain Threshold
44.9; 45.0; 44.8 1.0
SECONDARY
Thermal Pain Threshold Post-treatment 20 Min.
45.1; 45.4; 45.0 0.4
SECONDARY
Thermal Pain Threshold Post-treatment 40 Min.
45.2; 45.7; 45.2 0.1
SECONDARY
Baseline Nerve Conduction Latency
3.6; 3.6; 3.6 0.9
SECONDARY
Nerve Conduction Latency Post-treatment 20 Min.
3.7; 3.7; 3.7 0.9
SECONDARY
Nerve Conduction Latency Post-treatment 40 Min.
3.7; 3.7; 3.6 0.5
SECONDARY
Baseline Tactile Threshold
1.1; 1.0; 1.0 0.6
SECONDARY
Tactile Threshold Post-treatment 20 Min.
1.4; 1.5; 1.0 0.1
SECONDARY
Tactile Threshold Post-treatment 40 Min.
1.3; 1.1; 1.0 0.2

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the transcutaneous application of unmodulated 5 Kilohertz (KHz) alternating currents are effective in decreasing the thermal and mechanical experimental pain and cause changes in peripheral nerve conduction. Moreover evidence whether the effect and comfort of this current is greater than Conventional TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) commonly used for the treatment of clinical pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Participants will be volunteer healthy students of Physiotherapy, University of Castilla - La Mancha, older than 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Neuromuscular disease.
  • Epilepsy.
  • Trauma, surgery or pain affecting the upper limb, shoulder girdle or cervical area.
  • Osteosynthesis material in the upper limb.
  • Diabetes.
  • Cancer.
  • Cardiovascular disease.
  • Pacemaker or other implanted electrical device.
  • Take any drug (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, antidepressants, analgesics, antiepileptics, ...) during the study and in the previous 7 days.
  • Presence of tattoos or other external agent introduced into the treatment or assessment area.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Sensitivity disturbance in upper limb.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02320838). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search