Phase 2
N=452
A Study of Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Cefiderocol (S-649266) Versus Imipenem/Cilastatin in Complicated Urinary Tract Infections
Urinary Tract Infections
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02321800 ↗Enrolled (actual)
452
Serious AEs
5.8%
Results posted
Dec 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants With Composite Response of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Response at Test of Cure — 72.6; 54.6 percentage of participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Interventions
- Cefiderocol (Drug); Imipenem/cilastatin (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Shionogi
- Primary completion
- Jul 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With Composite Response of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Response at Test of Cure |
72.6; 54.6 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Composite Response of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Response at Early Assessment |
88.1; 87.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Composite Response of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Response at End of Treatment |
96.4; 95.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Composite Response of Microbiological Eradication and Clinical Response at Follow-up |
54.4; 39.5 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Test of Cure |
73.0; 56.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Early Assessment |
92.1; 90.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at End of Treatment |
96.8; 95.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Follow-up |
57.1; 43.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Test of Cure Per Uropathogen |
75.0; 58.2; 75.0; 52.0; 44.4; 60.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Early Assessment Per Uropathogen |
92.8; 94.9; 89.6; 88.0; 94.4; 80.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at End of Treatment Per Uropathogen |
98.7; 97.5; 97.9; 92.0; 88.9; 100.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Eradication at Follow-up Per Uropathogen |
59.9; 41.8; 58.3; 52.0; 27.8; 20.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure |
89.7; 87.4 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Early Assessment |
90.5; 90.8 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment |
98.0; 99.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-up |
81.3; 72.3 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Test of Cure Per Uropathogen |
89.7; 88.3; 89.1; 84.0; 73.3; 75.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Early Assessment Per Uropathogen |
91.8; 96.1; 82.6; 88.0; 93.3; 75.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at End of Treatment Per Uropathogen |
97.9; 98.7; 100.0; 100.0; 93.3; 100.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-up Per Uropathogen |
82.9; 72.7; 82.6; 68.0; 53.3; 75.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Plasma Concentration of Cefiderocol |
18.0; 141; 70.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Urine Concentration of Cefiderocol |
2710; 1520 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants With Adverse Events |
122; 76; 27; 17; 1; 0 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous cefiderocol (S-649266) in hospitalized adults with complicated urinary tract infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Hospitalized male and female patients ≥ 18 years
- Clinical diagnosis of either complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) with or without pyelonephritis or acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis
- cUTI diagnosed with a history of ≥ 1 of the following:
- Indwelling urinary catheter or recent instrumentation of the urinary tract
- Urinary retention (caused by benign prostatic hypertrophy)
- Urinary retention of at least 100 mL or more of residual urine after voiding (neurogenic bladder)
- Obstructive uropathy
- Azotemia caused by intrinsic renal disease (blood urea nitrogen and creatinine values greater than normal laboratory values) OR Pyelonephritis and normal urinary tract anatomy, ie, acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis AND
At least 2 of the following signs or symptoms:
- Chills or rigors or warmth associated with fever (temperature greater than or equal to 38 degrees Celsius)
- Flank pain (pyelonephritis) or suprapubic/pelvic pain (cUTI)
- Nausea or vomiting
- Dysuria, urinary frequency, or urinary urgency
- Costo-vertebral angle tenderness on physical examination AND
All subjects had to have urinalysis evidence of pyuria demonstrated by 1 of the following:
- Dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase
- ≥ 10 white blood cells (WBCs) per μL in unspun urine, or ≥ 10 WBCs per high power field in spun urine
- Positive urine culture within 48 hours prior to randomization containing ≥10^5 colony forming unit (CFU)/mL of a Gram-negative uropathogen likely to be susceptible to imipenem (IPM)
- Patients who were treated previously with an empiric antibiotic other than the study drugs but failed treatment, both clinically and microbiologically, were eligible for the study if they had an identified Gram-negative uropathogen that was not susceptible to the previously used empiric treatment and likely to be susceptible to IPM
- Subjects receiving antibiotic prophylaxis for UTI who present with signs and symptoms consistent with an active new UTI
Exclusion Criteria
- Urine culture identifies only a Gram-positive pathogen and/or a Gram-negative uropathogen resistant to IPM
- Urine culture at study entry isolates more than 2 uropathogens or patient has a confirmed fungal UTI
- Asymptomatic bacteriuria, the presence of >10^5 CFU/mL of a uropathogen and pyuria but without local or systemic symptoms
- Patient is receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02321800). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.