Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=31 Randomized Basic Science

Pharmacokinetic Comparison Of All FK-506 Formulations

Renal Failure

Enrolled (actual)
31
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf. — 5.91; 1.93; 1.48 hour

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
Prograf vs Envarsus XR vs Astagraf XL (Drug); Prograf vs Astagraf XL vs Envarsus XR (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Veloxis Pharmaceuticals
Primary completion
Mar 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Evaluation of T(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
5.91; 1.93; 1.48
PRIMARY
Evaluation of C(Max) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
13.88; 13.17; 14.54
PRIMARY
Evaluation of AUC(0-24) for Envarsus XR, Astagraf XL and Prograf.
213.41; 165.02; 176.52

Summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the pharmacokinetic parameters of three different formulations of tacrolimus. Eligible patients will be treated with all three formulations in a pre-defined sequence.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Renal transplant recipients, males or females, of 18 years of age or above.
  • Able to participate and willing to give written informed consent and to comply with study visits and restrictions.
  • Able to understand English.
  • Patients having received a primary or secondary renal transplant

Exclusion Criteria

  • Evidence of acute rejection episode within the past three months prior to screening.
  • Recipients of organ transplants other than kidney.
  • Patients who are known to be HIV positive.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02339246). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search