Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=107 Randomized Treatment

Moderate Versus Deep Procedural Sedation With Propofol in the Emergency Department

Pain

Enrolled (actual)
107
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
May 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: Patients With Clinical Signs of Respiratory Depression or Sub Clinical Respiratory Depressions Measured by Capnography and Pulse Oximetry. — 22; 21 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Moderate Procedural Sedation with a sedative medication. (Procedure); Deep Procedural Sedation with a sedative medication. (Procedure); propofol (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Primary completion
Oct 2018

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Patients With Clinical Signs of Respiratory Depression or Sub Clinical Respiratory Depressions Measured by Capnography and Pulse Oximetry.
22; 21

Summary

This study is a clinical trial of moderate sedation versus deep sedation with propofol for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of amnesia and respiratory depression rate in patients who receive moderate sedation to those that receive deep sedation.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults undergoing procedural sedation with propofol in the emergency department

Exclusion Criteria

  • < 18 years old
  • Pregnant
  • Previous allergic reaction to propofol
  • Prisoner
  • Unable to provide informed consent
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02404610). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search