Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=68 Randomized Double-blind Treatment

Optimal Sevoflurane Concentration for Intubation in Combination of Clincal Remifentanil Doses

Postoperative Pain

Enrolled (actual)
68
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2019
Primary outcome: Primary: EC50 for Successful Intubation in Each Groups — 3.00; 2.00; 1.29 vol%

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Intubation (Procedure); Remifentanil (Drug); Sevoflurane (Drug)
Age
Adult · 19+ yrs
Sex
Male
Sponsor
Severance Hospital
Primary completion
Apr 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
EC50 for Successful Intubation in Each Groups
3.00; 2.00; 1.29
SECONDARY
EC95 for Successful Intubation
3.45; 2.91; 1.89

Summary

Intubation is a procedure that requires well relaxed muscles while general anesthesia is performed. In order to get adequate muscle relaxation, remifentanil, sevoflurane or both agents in combination have been reported as they can provide adequate conditions for laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation without using muscle relaxants. However, there were no previous studies to find the effective dose of sevoflurane in combination with different bolus doses of remifentanil to obtain adequate endotracheal intubation conditions without using muscle relaxants. The aim of this study is to investigate the change in the minimum sevoflurane alveolar concentration which produces an adequate endotracheal intubation condition when sevoflurane is combined with different bolus doses of remifentanil used in clinical practice.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II who were scheduled to undergo elective otolaryngological surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • history of reactive airway disease
  • smoking hx.
  • a predictive signs of difficult intubation
  • body mass index ≥ 30 kg•m-2 or ≤ 15 kg•m-2
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02440204). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search