Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=11 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Capsaicin 8% Patch for Spinal Cord Injury Neuropathic Pain

Spinal Cord Injuries · Neuropathic Pain

Enrolled (actual)
11
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Pain Relief With Visual Analog (VAS) Pain Scale — 3.586; 5.494; 4.041; 5.677 score on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Capsaicin 8% Patch (Drug); Low Dose Capsaicin 0.025% Well Patch (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Primary completion
Jul 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Pain Relief With Visual Analog (VAS) Pain Scale
3.586; 5.494; 4.041; 5.677; 4.984; 5.768
PRIMARY
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF)
79.26; 80.91; 80.91; 85.42; 74.90; 87.42
PRIMARY
Change in Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
20.32; 18.86; 20.70; 18.66; 19.23; 18.86

Summary

A prospective case control study to determine the effectiveness and longevity of 8% capsaicin patch(es) in treating neuropathic pain in persons with spinal cord injury. The investigators will study spinal cord injury patients at South Texas Veterans Health Care Systems Spinal Cord Injury inpatient unit and outpatient clinics.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of SCI
  • Neuropathic pain below level of injury
  • Surface area of pain no larger than 2 patches
  • Failed or did not tolerate gabapentin 3600mg/day, pregabalin 600mg/day, capsaicin cream and/or lidocaine cream
  • Skin over painful area intact

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pain over open wound
  • Previously documented allergy to capsaicin
  • Superficial burn over area of pain
  • Premorbid (before SCI) neuropathic pain
  • HIV/AIDS neuropathy
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02441660). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search