Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=50 Randomized Other

Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol TIVA (Total Intravenous Anesthesia) and Interscalene Block

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02469961 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
50
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants That Need an Airway Intervention. — 0; 5 participants

Summary

The standard hospital procedure calls for the patient to undergo Interscalene block under ultrasound with or without nerve stimulation guidance prior to going to operating room (OR). The block utilizes a 40 ml mixture of 0.5% Ropivacaine and Lidocaine 1.5%. At this time the patient receives preliminary sedation with Midazolam 1mg IV and Fentanyl 50 mcg IV. The participant is then brought to the OR and prolonged sedation is initiated, randomly using either Dexmedetomidine or Propofol. The primary objective of the present study is to use Dexmedetomidine for sedation, and compare the outcomes with Propofol sedation. The investigators will enroll 50 patients for this study. Our hypothesis is that Dexmedetomidine will cause fewer episodes of intermittent apnea, and reduced need for supplemental medication for sedation, compared to Propofol

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants That Need an Airway Intervention.
0; 5
SECONDARY
Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Length of Stay
159; 126
SECONDARY
Number of Participants That Have Either Bradycardia or Hypotension
4; 5
SECONDARY
Total Narcotic Used by Each Participant
7.1; 9

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Participants scheduled for shoulder arthroscopies in the beach chair sitting position.

Participants who received a successful interscalene block.

Exclusion Criteria

Failed interscalene block. Refusal to participate in the study. Allergy to the study drugs. Participants that need a secure airway.

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02469961). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search