Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=242 Randomized Treatment

Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia Versus Local Infiltration Analgesia Following Knee Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis

Enrolled (actual)
242
Serious AEs
3.6%
Results posted
Nov 2015
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Patients Discharged From Rehabilitation by Day Four — 77; 82 percentage of patients — p=0.332

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA) (Drug); Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Golden Jubilee National Hospital
Primary completion
Aug 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Patients Discharged From Rehabilitation by Day Four
77; 82 0.332
SECONDARY
Average Post-operative Length of Stay
4; 4
SECONDARY
Verbal Rating Score (VRS) Pain Scores
3; 3; 3; 4; 3; 4
SECONDARY
Post-operative Urinary Catheterisation Rates
9.2; 4.4
SECONDARY
Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting Scores
16; 14
SECONDARY
Day of Ambulation
35; 51; 65; 49; 4; 0
SECONDARY
Maximal Flexion Angle of the Operative Knee at Discharge From Rehabilitation
80; 80
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Outcome Measure - Oxford Knee Score
43; 43; 28; 26; 19; 19
SECONDARY
Total Number of Reported Participants With Complications and/or Adverse Events
0; 2; 2; 4

Summary

The purpose of this study was to determine if the method of peri-operative analgesia used following total Knee Replacement surgery affected the progress towards rehabilitation goals and to determine whether the analgesia had any impact on long term outcomes.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients (age> 18years old) undergoing primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients planned for uni-compartmental/bilateral or revision knee surgery patients
  • Patients with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
  • Patients with coagulation or anatomical defects e.g. preventing the use of spinal anaesthesia
  • Known allergies to any medications within the trial
  • Patients who were unable to give written informed consent
  • Patients requiring pre-operative catheterisation for urinary outflow dysfunction
  • Known neurological incident that would limit or make impossible early ambulation following surgery
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02478372). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search