Phase 3
Completed N=879
Linagliptin as Add on Therapy to Empagliflozin 10 mg or 25 mg With Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02489968 ↗Enrolled (actual)
879
Serious AEs
2.9%
Results posted
Sep 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Change in Glycated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) From Baseline After 24 Weeks of Treatment — -0.94; -0.12; -0.91; -0.33 Percentage (%) — p=<0.0001
◆ Published Evidence
Emerging
15citations · ~2 / year
Linagliptin as add-on to empagliflozin in a fixed-dose combination in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Glycaemic efficacy and safety profile in a two-part, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Summary
Two independent study parts (i.e. Part A and Part B) are included in this trial. Part A will evaluate empagliflozin 10 mg + linagliptin and Part B will evaluate empagliflozin 25 mg + linagliptin. All analyses will be carried out separately for these study parts. The objective of Part A is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the fixed dose combination (FDC) of empagliflozin 10 mg / linagliptin 5 mg compared with empagliflozin 10 mg plus FDC matching placebo administered orally once daily for 24 weeks in Japanese patients with T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) who have insufficient glycaemic control after 16 weeks of treatment with empagliflozin 10 mg alone once daily. The study is designed to show superiority of the FDC of empagliflozin 10 mg / linagliptin 5 mg over empagliflozin 10 mg plus FDC matching placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. The objective of Part B is to investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of the FDC of empagliflozin 25 mg / linagliptin 5 mg compared with empagliflozin 25 mg plus FDC matching placebo administered orally once daily for 24 weeks in Japanese patients with T2DM who have insufficient glycaemic control after 16 weeks of treatment with empagliflozin 25 mg alone once daily. The study is designed to show superiority of the FDC of empagliflozin 25 mg / linagliptin 5 mg over empagliflozin 25 mg plus FDC matching placebo after 24 weeks of treatment. The 24 week treatment period will be followed by a 28 week extension treatment period to evaluate further efficacy and safety up to 52 weeks.
Linked Publications
-
Linagliptin as add-on to empagliflozin in a fixed-dose combination in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes: Glycaemic efficacy and safety profile in a two-part, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Change in Glycated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (%) From Baseline After 24 Weeks of Treatment |
-0.94; -0.12; -0.91; -0.33 | <0.0001 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes prior to informed consent
- Male and female patients on diet and exercise regimen for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent who are:
- drug-naïve, defined as no antidiabetic drugs for at least 12 weeks prior to informed consent or,
- pre-treated with one oral antidiabetic drug (for sulfonylurea, with up to half of the maximum approved dose) on stable dosage for at least 12 weeks prior to the informed consent (for thiazolidinedione, therapy has to be unchanged for at least 18 weeks prior to the informed consent). Individual antidiabetic drug will have to be discontinued at Visit 1.
- haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Visit 1 (screening)
- for patients without antidiabetic therapy : HbA1c >=8.0 to = =7.5 to = =7.5 to = 270 mg/dL (>15.0 mmol/L) during the open label stabilisation period and placebo run in period
- Impaired renal function, defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73m2 (modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formula)
- Acute coronary syndrome, stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 12 weeks prior to informed consent
- Indication of liver disease, defined by serum levels of either alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) above 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02489968) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.