Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=66 Randomized Supportive Care

Study of Palliative Radiotherapy for Symptomatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Liver Metastases

Hepatocellular Carcinoma · Liver Metastases

Enrolled (actual)
66
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcome: Primary: Proportion of Patients Achieving Significant Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort — 16; 4 Participants — p=0.004

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Best Supportive Care (Other); Palliative Radiation Therapy (Radiation)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Canadian Cancer Trials Group
Primary completion
Oct 2022

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Proportion of Patients Achieving Significant Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort
16; 4 0.004 sig
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients Alive at Day 90.
51.18; 32.99 0.068
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients Achieving a 25% Reduction in Opioid Use at 30 Days (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale).
5; 3 0.45
SECONDARY
Proportion of Patients Achieving Improvement of Liver Cancer Pain/Discomfort by ≥ 2 Points in Pain "Intensity at Worst " AND With no Increase in Opioid Use (Employing Daily Morphine Equivalence Scale) on BPI From Baseline to 30 Days.
3; 0 0.07

Summary

The purpose of this study is to see whether one dose of palliative radiation therapy directed to the liver in combination with standard BSC might help to reduce liver pain/discomfort due to cancer when compared to getting standard BSC alone.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • A diagnosis of cancer by at least one criterion listed below:
  • Pathologically or cytologically proven carcinoma from primary site or site of metastases;
  • Pathologically or cytologically proven HCC;
  • HCC diagnosed by standard imaging criteria: arterial enhancement and delayed washout on multiphasic computerized tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the setting of cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis B or C without cirrhosis.
  • Largest burden of cancer in the liver is confirmed with CT scan or MRI corresponding to the clinically painful area done within 120 days prior to randomization.
  • Diffuse (infiltrative involving > 50% of the liver), multifocal (> 10 lesions) or locally advanced cancer (at least one lesion > 10cm, vascular invasion, or multiple lesions with at least one > 6cm) involving the liver.
  • In the investigator's opinion, patient is unsuitable for or refractory to standard local and regional therapies. For example:
  • HCC unsuitable for resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemo embolization (TACE) or radical intent, ablative dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT);
  • Colorectal carcinoma metastases unsuitable for resection, RFA or radical intent, ablative dose SBRT (e.g. SBRT, > 30 Gy in 5 fractions, may be an option for up to 3 metastases 70 g/L;
  • Platelets > 25 x 10^9/L
  • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) > 1.0 x 10^9/L
  • INR 3 months.
  • 18 years of age or older at the time of randomization.
  • Patient is willing to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and the Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire in English, French or other validated language (please contact the HE.1 Study Coordinator). The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization. Unwillingness to complete the Pre-Baseline Pain/Discomfort Questionnaire and Pain/Discomfort and Medication Questionnaire will make the patient ineligible for the study.
  • Patient is able (i.e. sufficiently fluent) and willing to complete the QoL questionnaires in English, French or other languages in which the FACT-Hep is available. The baseline assessment must be completed within required timelines prior to randomization.

Inability (illiteracy in languages listed above, loss of sight, or other equivalent reason) to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study. However, ability but unwillingness to complete the QoL questionnaires will make the patient ineligible for QoL assessment.

  • Patient is not pregnant, planning on becoming pregnant or planning on fathering a child in the next 90 days.

Women/men of childbearing potential must have agreed to use a highly effective contraceptive method. A woman is considered to be of "childbearing potential" if she has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months. In addition to routine contraceptive methods, "effective contraception" also includes heterosexual celibacy and surgery intended to prevent pregnancy (or with a side-effect of pregnancy prevention) defined as a hysterectomy, bilateral oophorectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or vasectomy/vasectomized partner. However, if at any point a previously celibate patient chooses to become heterosexually active during the time period for use of contraceptive measures outlined in the protocol, he/she is responsible for beginning contraceptive measures.

Women of childbearing potential will have a pregnancy test to determine eligibility as part of the Pre-Study Evaluation; this may include an ultrasound to rule-out pregnancy if a false-positive is suspected. For example, when beta-human chorionic gonadotropin is high and partner is vasectomized, it may be associated with tumour production of hCG, as seen with some cancers. Patient will be considered eligible if an ultrasound is negative for pregnancy

  • Patient consent must be appropriately obtained in accordance with applicable local and regulatory requirement
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02511522). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search