Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=101

Angiographic Comparison in an Observational Study of CADence (The AMBIENCE Study)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02515825 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
101
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent of Participants With Positive Agreement of CADence Device Under Normal Use Conditions as Compared to Coronary Angiograms as Accurate and Appropriate — 101; 31 Participants

Summary

This is a prospective, multi-center study to capture information on sensitivity and specificity of CADence using coronary angiogram as the gold standard, on subjects who are already scheduled for coronary angiography.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent of Participants With Positive Agreement of CADence Device Under Normal Use Conditions as Compared to Coronary Angiograms as Accurate and Appropriate
101; 31
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With CADence-related Adverse Events
0; 101

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age >40 years
  • Clinical indication for coronary angiogram
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Body Mass Index (BMI) 40
  • Prior bypass surgery or coronary stenting
  • Presence of pacemaker/defibrillator
  • Presence of artificial valve
  • Presence of obvious cyanotic or pre-diagnosed congenital heart defect and coarctation of the aorta
  • Presence of murmurs, including valve lesions, ventricular septal defects and arteriovenous fistulae
  • Presence of moderate-severe valve disease
  • Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)
  • Presence of scars on the site thorax areas
  • Participation in trial within 30 days prior to collecting CADence data except participation in registry studies.
  • Asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with active wheezing
  • Inability to lie in supine position
  • Heart Transplant
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02515825). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search