Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=157 Treatment

Aequalis Pyrocarbon IDE; Replacing the Humeral Head in Hemi-Arthroplasty

Osteoarthritis · Avascular Necrosis · Traumatic Arthritis

Enrolled (actual)
157
Serious AEs
3.2%
Results posted
Jan 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: Rate of Patient Success at 24 Months. — 120 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Aequalis Pyrocarbon Humeral Head (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Stryker Trauma and Extremities
Primary completion
Jul 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Rate of Patient Success at 24 Months.
120
SECONDARY
Constant Score
34.3; 39.5; 78.1
SECONDARY
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score
43.4; 87.5
SECONDARY
Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE)
49.5; 85.4
SECONDARY
EQ-5D Index
.21; .87
SECONDARY
Pain Measured by a VIsual Analog Scale (VAS)
4.23; 1.14
SECONDARY
Range of Motion (ROM)
33.5; 43.5; 37.5
SECONDARY
Strength
5; 14.8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Device-related Serious Adverse Events
5
SECONDARY
Revision Rate
3
SECONDARY
Level of Satisfaction With the Shoulder
111; 20; 8; 5
SECONDARY
X-Ray Data
0; 0; 0; 78; 5; 0

Summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of the Aequalis Pyrocarbon Humeral Head in hemiarthroplasty at 24 months.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult subject 22 years or older.
  • Scapula and proximal humerus must have reached skeletal maturity.
  • Clinical indication for hemiarthroplasty due to primary diagnosis of arthritis or avascular necrosis. Primary arthritis for this study includes osteoarthritis with pain and/or post-traumatic arthritis.
  • Willing and able to comply with the protocol.
  • Willing and able to sign the informed consent formed (or the Legally Authorized Representative will sign for the subject).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active local or systemic infection, sepsis, or osteomyelitis.
  • In the opinion of the clinician, there is insufficient bone stock to support implants in the humeral metaphysis or poor bone quality.
  • In the opinion of the clinician, there is insufficient bone stock or excessive deformation of the native glenoid to allow normal functioning of the glenohumeral joint.
  • In the clinician's opinion, the subject is unwilling or unable to be compliant with the recommendations of the healthcare professional.
  • Metabolism disorders that could compromise bone formation, or Osteomalacia.
  • Infection at or near the implant site, distant foci of infections that could spread to the site of the implant, or systemic infection.
  • Rapid destruction of the joint, marked bone loss, or bone resorption apparent on X-ray.
  • Known allergy or suspected allergy to implant materials.
  • Female subjects who are pregnant or planning to become pregnant within the study period.
  • Medical conditions or balance impairments that could lead to falls. Prior arthroplasty or prior failed rotator cuff repair on the affected shoulder; (successful rotator cuff surgery may be included).
  • A rotator cuff that is not intact and cannot be reconstructed. Subjects with a massive rotator cuff tear (>5cm) will be excluded.
  • Nonfunctional deltoid muscle.
  • Neuromuscular compromise condition of the shoulder (e.g., neuropathic joints or brachial plexus injury with a flail shoulder joint).
  • Known active metastatic or neoplastic diseases, Paget's disease, or Charcot's disease.
  • Currently, within the last 6 months, or planning to be on chemotherapy or radiation.
  • Known alcohol or drug abuse as defined by DSM-5.
  • Taking greater than 5mg/day corticosteroids (e.g. prednisone) excluding inhalers, within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • Currently enrolled in any clinical research study that might interfere with the current study endpoints.
  • Known history of renal or hepatic disease/insufficiency.
  • Anatomy cannot be replicated using current available system sizes.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02525783). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search