N/A
Completed N=49
CPR Quality Between Flexible Stretcher and Standard Stretcher in OHCA
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527694 ↗Enrolled (actual)
49
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Comparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase Groups — 80.1; 85.2 Percentage of chest compression fraction
Summary
This study aims to compare the quality of emergency medical services cardiopulmonary resuscitation between flexible stretcher and standard stretcher during ambulance transport to hospital among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Comparison of Percentage of Chest Compression Fraction Between Before- and After-phase Groups |
80.1; 85.2 | — |
| SECONDARY CPR Duration |
909; 1131 | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- All EMS-assessed OHCA in (3-4) selected districts in Seoul
- 18 years or older of age
Exclusion Criteria
- Do-Not-Resuscitation cases or OHCA occurring in result of terminal diseases
- Signs of evident death (decapitation, evident livor mortis or rigor mortis)
- Pregnant
- Physique too large for mechanical CPR device application
- Chest deformation or injury
- EMS CPR quality not assessed by the defibrillator
- Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before scene departure
- Cardiac arrest cases during transport
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02527694). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.