Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=25 Basic Science

The Role of the Rate of Force Application in Responses to Spinal Manipulation Therapy

Spinal Manipulation
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02550132 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
25
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value — 3.72 ratio

Summary

The objective of the present study is to determine if spinal manipulations with a constant rate of force application but with different peak force and time to peak force lead to similar responses in healthy adults.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Left T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value
4.17 —
PRIMARY
Left T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value
4.80 —
PRIMARY
Right T6 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value
3.87 —
PRIMARY
Right T8 Normalized Root Mean Square (RMS) Value
3.79 —
PRIMARY
Vertebral Displacement of the Sixth Thoracic Vertebra
1.74 —
PRIMARY
Vertebral Displacement of the Seventh Thoracic Vertebra
1.40 —
PRIMARY
Vertebral Displacement of the Eighth Thoracic Vertebra
1.70 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Healthy adult

Exclusion Criteria

  • Thoracic or lumbar pain
  • History of back trauma or surgery
  • Severe osteoarthritis
  • Inflammatory arthritis
  • Vascular conditions
  • Contraindication to the use of SMT
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02550132). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search