Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=194 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Effectiveness of Fluoroscopy-guided MLD for Treatment of BCRL

Breast Neoplasm · Lymphedema

Enrolled (actual)
194
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Lymphoedema Volume at the Level of the Arm/ Hand — 1.228; 1.249; 1.218; 1.175 Inter-limb ratio

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Information (Other); Skin care (Other); Compression therapy (Other); Fluoroscopy-guided MLD (Other); Traditional MLD (Other); Placebo MLD (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Primary completion
Mar 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Lymphoedema Volume at the Level of the Arm/ Hand
1.228; 1.249; 1.218; 1.175; 1.197; 1.164
PRIMARY
Stagnation of Fluid at Level of the Shoulder/ Trunk
1.045; 1.051; 1.057; 1.088; 1.059; 1.077
SECONDARY
Extracellular Fluid in the Upper Limb
33.1; 32.3; 34.9; 24.4; 25.4; 23.9
SECONDARY
Thickness of Cutis and Subcutis of Arm and Trunk Measured With Ultrasound
1.52; 1.44; 1.45; 1.36; 1.38; 1.36
SECONDARY
Problems in Functioning Related to Development of Breast Cancer-related Lymphoedema
38.0; 35.7; 38.1; 29.0; 27.7; 32.1
SECONDARY
Elasticity of Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue of Arm and Trunk Using the SkinFibrometer
1.28; 1.26; 1.41; 1.11; 1.06; 1.14
SECONDARY
Quality of Life Score
5.96; 6.15; 5.87; 6.06; 6.18; 5.82
SECONDARY
Number of Episodes of Erysipelas
5; 8; 7
SECONDARY
Overall Treatment Satisfaction
80; 78; 80
SECONDARY
Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD)-Specific Treatment Satisfaction
8; 7; 7
SECONDARY
Local Tissue Water at the Level of the Arm and Trunk
1.418; 1.354; 1.406; 1.372; 1.292; 1.344
SECONDARY
Thickness of the Cutis and Subcutis of the Arm and Trunk Evaluated by Palpation (Pinch Test)
4.43; 4.03; 4.65; 4.62; 4.23; 4.57
SECONDARY
Hardness (Fibrosis) of the Skin at the Level of the Arm and Trunk Evaluated Through Palpation
0.49; 0.26; 0.24; 0.40; 0.44; 0.56
SECONDARY
Lymphatic Architecture and Function

Summary

The main scientific objective of this multicentric double-blinded randomised controlled trial entails examining the effectiveness of fluoroscopy-guided MLD versus traditional MLD versus placebo MLD, applied as part of the intensive and maintenance phase of Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy, for the treatment of BCRL Secondary scientific objectives entail examining the relationship between different variables of lymphoedema at baseline

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age >18y (since the treatment with MLD and the investigation using ICG is not dangerous for pregnant women, women with child bearing age are included)
  • Women/ men with breast cancer-related lymphoedema
  • Chronic lymphoedema (>3 months present), stage I to IIb
  • At least 5% difference between both arms and/ or hands, adjusted for dominance
  • Written informed consent obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy for iodine, sodiumiodine, ICG
  • Increased activity of the thyroid gland; benign tumors of the thyroid gland
  • Age <18y
  • Oedema of the upper limb from other causes
  • Active metastasis of the cancer
  • Surgery of the lymphatic system in the past (lymph node transplantation, lymphovenous shunt)
  • Cannot participate during the entire study period
  • Mentally or physically unable to participate in the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02609724). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search