Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=27 Randomized Single-blind Supportive Care

Computer Assisted Instrument Guidance (CAIG) for Orthopedic Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Peripheral Nerve Blocks

Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Time Needed to Correctly Identify the Neural Structure(s) and Induce the Peripheral Nerve Block — 2.606944444; 2.179761905 Minutes

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Peripheral Nerve Blocks with CAIG (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Clear Guide Medical
Primary completion
May 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Time Needed to Correctly Identify the Neural Structure(s) and Induce the Peripheral Nerve Block
2.606944444; 2.179761905
SECONDARY
Clinician Rating of the Device
SECONDARY
Number of Attempts
1; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Times Needle Needs Repositioning
SECONDARY
Patient Satisfaction Recorded on Post-op Day 1 Using Questionnaire
8.727272727; 9.181818182
SECONDARY
Number of Patients That Needed Rescue Opioids
6; 5
SECONDARY
Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
0; 2
SECONDARY
Undesired Muscle Weakness Measured Subjectively
2; 1

Summary

The objective of this research is to determine if the addition of the Clear Guide ONE, a Computer Assisted Instrument Guidance (CAIG) system, provides improvement over existing ultrasound guided, needle-based procedures for peripheral nerve blocks. The ultrasound can visualize the targeted vessel or nerve, but the addition of the CAIG may help the clinician better guide the needle to the target.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Undergoing orthopedic surgery who are candidates for peripheral nerve blocks for control of postoperative pain
  • Able to give written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Patients in whom regional anesthesia is contradicted
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02614222). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search