Phase 4
N=27
Nu-Mask Intraoral Airway Device Versus Conventional Bag Valve Mask Ventilation Crossover Trial
Apnea
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02627001 ↗Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2016
Primary outcome: Primary: Received Minute Volume (Liters) as Measured by Wright Respirometer — 6.8; 5.2 Liters — p=<0.001
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Interventions
- NuMask Intraoral Airway Device (Device); Bag Valve Mask (Device)
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Brooke Army Medical Center
- Primary completion
- Nov 2015
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Received Minute Volume (Liters) as Measured by Wright Respirometer |
6.8; 5.2 | <0.001 sig |
Summary
This study comprised a randomized cross-over trial of ventilation using the NuMask Intraoral Mask versus conventional Bag Valve Mask in a cadaver model among United States Army combat medics.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- United States Army Combat Medics
Exclusion Criteria
- Injuries precluding performance of bag valve mask ventilation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02627001). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.