Phase 4
Completed N=27
Nu-Mask Intraoral Airway Device Versus Conventional Bag Valve Mask Ventilation Crossover Trial
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02627001 ↗Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jul 2016
Primary outcomePrimary: Received Minute Volume (Liters) as Measured by Wright Respirometer — 6.8; 5.2 Liters — p=<0.001
◆ Published Evidence
No publication linked
No peer-reviewed publication reporting this trial's results has been linked yet. This can indicate results are unpublished — a known publication-bias signal. We re-check periodically.
Summary
This study comprised a randomized cross-over trial of ventilation using the NuMask Intraoral Mask versus conventional Bag Valve Mask in a cadaver model among United States Army combat medics.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Received Minute Volume (Liters) as Measured by Wright Respirometer |
6.8; 5.2 | <0.001 sig |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- United States Army Combat Medics
Exclusion Criteria
- Injuries precluding performance of bag valve mask ventilation
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02627001). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.