Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=236 Randomized Treatment

Cervical Ripening for Obese Women: A Randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial

Obesity · Labor Induction · Cesarean Delivery
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02639429 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
236
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Aug 2019
Primary outcomePrimary: Number of Participants With a Need for Cesarean Delivery — 51; 53 Participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
139citations · ~46 / year
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

Obese pregnant women (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) are more likely than their normal-weight counterparts to require induction of labor because of increased rates of obstetric complications including pregnancy related hypertensive disorders, diabetes, and prolonged gestations. Several studies have shown that obese women experience increased labor duration and oxytocin needs when compared to normal-weight women. This in turn results in increased rates for unplanned cesarean delivery (CD) as a result of failed induction of labor (IOL), arrest disorders and non-reassuring fetal heart rate tracing, that is dose-dependent with increasing class of obesity. The investigators hypothesize that obese pregnant women and unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 6), IOL ≥ 24 weeks gestation using the Foley balloon plus vaginal misoprostol will result in reduced cesarean delivery rates when compared to vaginal misoprostol alone.

Linked Publications (2)

  • Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023 · 139 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Transcervical Foley Balloon Plus Vaginal Misoprostol versus Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening in Nulliparous Obese Women: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-Effectiveness Trial.
    American journal of perinatology · 2021 · 10 citations · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With a Need for Cesarean Delivery
51; 53
SECONDARY
Indication for Cesarean Delivery
31; 28; 13; 18; 7; 7
SECONDARY
Induction-to-delivery Interval in Hours
24.8; 24.5
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Need for Oxytocin Augmentation
89; 103
SECONDARY
Number of Participants Exhibiting Tachysystole Resulting in Fetal Heart Rate Abnormalities
10; 20
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Clinical Chorioamnionitis
1; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With a Need for Operative Vaginal Delivery
5; 6
SECONDARY
Composite Maternal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Participants With Measures of Maternal Morbidity
0; 3; 3; 0; 5; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns Admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
24; 20
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns With Transient Tachypnea (TTN)
5; 5
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)
5; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns With Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns With Culture-proven Sepsis
0; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Newborns With Seizures
0; 0
SECONDARY
Composite Neonatal Morbidity as Indicated by the Number of Newborns With Measures of Neonatal Morbidity
4; 3; 5; 5; 3; 3

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Nulliparous women aged 18 or above
  • BMI ≥ 30 at the time of labor induction
  • Singleton gestation
  • Cephalic presentation (includes successful external cephalic version)
  • Intact fetal membranes
  • Unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of ≤ 6)
  • Gestational age ≥ 32 weeks

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient not candidate for IOL with misoprostol as deemed by the treating physician
  • Multiple gestation
  • Major fetal anomalies
  • Fetal demise
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02639429) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search