Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=20 Randomized Triple-blind Treatment

Discrete Versus Rhythmic Gait Training

Stroke · Cerebral Vascular Disorders

Enrolled (actual)
20
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Sep 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Functional Ambulation Scale (FAC) — 1; 0 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Novel Protocol (Procedure); Standard Protocol (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Thais Amanda Rodrigues
Primary completion
Mar 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Functional Ambulation Scale (FAC)
1; 0
SECONDARY
Six-minute Walking Test (6MWT)
25.4; 7.6
SECONDARY
Time Up and Go (TUG)
-42.1; -11.3
SECONDARY
Ten-meters Walking Test (10MWT)
-52.8; -20.3
SECONDARY
Lower Limbs Fugl-Meyer
2.3; -1.1
SECONDARY
Berg Scale
11.1; 6.0

Summary

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of novel versus standard locomotor training using a robotic gait orthosis (LT-RGO) after stroke. The hypothesis is that the novel LT-RGO protocol, by establishing a progressive decrease in gait velocity and guidance force, may facilitate greater motor recovery compared to the use of a standard protocol.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of stroke and image with hemiparesis left or right;
  • No more that one ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke episode;
  • 06 months post-stroke;
  • Verified clinical stability on medical evaluation;
  • Spasticity level I or II in the Ashworth scale;
  • Score 1-2 in the Functional Ambulation Scale (FAC);
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Dependence to perform activities of daily living before the stroke;
  • Lack of clinical indications for exercises (such as cardiopulmonary instability and uncontrolled diabetes);
  • Severe cognitive impairment;
  • Serious psychiatric change that needs psychiatric care;
  • Severe osteoporosis;
  • Severe spasticity of the lower limbs, deformities or fixed contractures that prevent the achievement of movements;
  • Lack of resistance or disabling fatigue;
  • Body weight greater than 150 kg;
  • Unstable angina or other untreated heart disease;
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
  • Unconsolidated fractures, pressure sores;
  • Other neurological diseases.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02650440). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search