N/A
N=34
Comparative Effectiveness of Decision Aids for Stable Chest Discomfort
Coronary Artery Disease · Stable Angina
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02652208 ↗Enrolled (actual)
34
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Aug 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Total Knowledge Score — 2.83; 4.0 knowledge score
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Online decision aid (Behavioral); Video decision aid (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Primary completion
- Jun 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Total Knowledge Score |
2.83; 4.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Treatment Leaning (Percentage of Patients Who Have a Clear Treatment Preference) |
4; 5 | — |
| SECONDARY Satisfaction With the Intervention |
6; 10 | — |
Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare two different types of decision support materials for patients considering treatment for chest pain or chest discomfort from heart disease.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults 18 and older
- English speaking
- Current diagnosis of stable angina
- Ability to access online material and willing to provide an email address
Exclusion Criteria
- Coronary bypass surgery and/or percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 months
- Diagnosis of unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome, STEMI, non STEMI within 6 months
- Scheduled for nonelective catheterization
- Significant cognitive deficit such that participant is unable to consent for self
- Serious comorbidities or other conditions that make revascularization inappropriate
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02652208). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.