Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=240 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

Orphenadrine and Methocarbamol for LBP

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02665286 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
240
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jun 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Functional Impairment as Measured on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire — 10.9; 9.4; 8.1 units on a scale
◆ Published Evidence
Established
68citations · ~9 / year
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Naproxen With or Without Orphenadrine or Methocarbamol for Acute Low Back Pain.
Annals of emergency medicine · 2018 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

Low back pain is a common cause of visit to emergency department. It is not clear if skeletal muscle relaxants are of benefit for patients with acute low back pain. This is a randomized study to determine if skeletal muscle relaxants, when combined with naproxen, improve outcomes more than naproxen alone

Linked Publications

  • A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Naproxen With or Without Orphenadrine or Methocarbamol for Acute Low Back Pain.
    Annals of emergency medicine · 2018 · 68 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Functional Impairment as Measured on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
10.9; 9.4; 8.1
SECONDARY
Cases of Moderate or Severe LBP
34; 26; 31
SECONDARY
Medications--Patient Self Report of Medication Use
42; 40; 50
SECONDARY
Patient Satisfaction With Treatment
51; 53; 51

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • LBP duration <= 2 weeks
  • No trauma to low back within previous month
  • No radicular symptoms
  • No history of low back pain or history of only infrequent episodes

Exclusion Criteria

  • Medication allergies or contra-indications
  • Not available for follow-up
  • Chronic pain syndrome
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02665286) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search