Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 2 N=151 Randomized Treatment

Study of Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib in Combination With Trametinib in Pediatric Patients With BRAF V600 Mutation Positive LGG or Relapsed or Refractory HGG Tumors

Diffuse Astrocytoma · Anaplastic Astrocytoma · Astrocytoma · Oligodendroglioma, Childhood · Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma

Enrolled (actual)
151
Serious AEs
50.3%
Results posted
May 2023
Primary outcome: Primary: LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria — 46.6; 10.8 Percentage of participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Interventions
Dabrafenib (Drug); trametinib (Drug); Carboplatin (Drug); Vincristine (Drug)
Age
Pediatric · 0+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Primary completion
Aug 2021

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
LGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria
46.6; 10.8 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
HGG Cohort: Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
56.1
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
54.8; 13.5; 58.9; 18.9
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
20.3; NA; 30.0; 19.4
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
NA; NA; 44.4; 22.5
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
20.1; 7.4; 24.9; 7.2 <0.001 sig
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
NA; NA; 46.0; 30.8
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
11.0; NA
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
7.4; NA
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
86.3; 43.2
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
91.8; 56.8
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
NA; NA
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: 2-year OS Estimate
100.0; 96.9
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: ORR by Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
58.5; 61.0
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
22.2; 27.4
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
26.6; 32.7
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
9.0
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigatort Assessment Using RANO Criteria
24.0
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
8.5
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Time to Response (TTR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
3.4
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Central Independent Assessment Using RANO Criteria
65.9
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) as Per Investigator Assessment Using RANO Criteria
75.6
SECONDARY
HGG Cohort: Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Overall Survival (OS)
NA
SECONDARY
AUClast for Trametinib
282; 328
SECONDARY
Cmax for Trametinib
21.3; 22.7
SECONDARY
AUCtau for Trametinib
307; 339
SECONDARY
Tmax for Trametinib
1.67; 1.53
SECONDARY
T1/2 for Trametinib
26.7; 25.7
SECONDARY
Ctrough for Trametinib
8.73; 9.82
SECONDARY
AUClast for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
4330; 4870; 73400; 64200; 3520; 3870
SECONDARY
Cmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
1520; 1330; 9050; 7210; 388; 377
SECONDARY
AUCtau for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
4300; 4910; 71200; 60700; 3360; 3660
SECONDARY
Tmax for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
1.47; 1.47; 3.37; 3.66; 2.21; 2.29
SECONDARY
T1/2 for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
2.48; 3.09; 7.12; 6.59; 7.06; 16.1
SECONDARY
Ctrough for Dabrafenib and Its Metabolites (Carboxy-dabrafenib, Desmethyl-dabrafenib Amd Hydroxy-dabrafenib)
38.0; 46.0; 3980; 3190; 275; 310
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
5; 18; 2; 4; 0; 0
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Taste of the Medication Before Rinsing the Mouth
2; 15; 3; 5; 0; 2
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
4; 13; 1; 6; 0; 0
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: After- Taste Once the Medication Was Swallowed
3; 15; 3; 5; 0; 2
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
4; 13; 1; 5; 0; 1
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Immediate Reaction Once the Medication Was Placed Into the Mouth
3; 15; 3; 4; 0; 3
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Dabrafenib Oral Suspension Based on the Palatability Questionnaire Item: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
4; 15; 2; 5; 0; 0
SECONDARY
HGG and LGG Cohort: Palatability of Trametinib Oral Solution Based on the Palatability Assessment: Remaining After-taste Once Rinsing the Mouth With Water
2; 15; 2; 3; 0; 2
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Global Health Score
42.67; 42.89; 42.14; 39.06; 43.83; 38.36
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Pain Score
52.14; 52.64; 50.11; 50.97; 49.93; 51.00
SECONDARY
LGG Cohort: PROMIS Parent Proxy Global Health 7+2 Scores- Fatigue Score
53.30; 54.37; 53.96; 56.88; 52.68; 58.10

Summary

The purpose of this study was to investigate the activity of dabrafenib in combination with trametinib in children and adolescent patients with BRAF V600 mutation positive low grade glioma (LGG) or relapsed or refractory high grade glioma (HGG)

Eligibility Criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant High Grade glioma that had relapsed, progressed or failed to respond to frontline therapy
  • Diagnosis of BRAF V600 mutant Low Grade glioma with progressive disease following surgical excision, or non-surgical candidates with necessity to begin first systemic treatment because of a risk of neurological impairment with progression.
  • Confirmed measurable disease

Key Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous treatment with dabrafenib, trametinib, other RAF inhibitor, other MEK or ERK inhibitor
  • HGG patient: Cancer treatment within the past 3 weeks. LGG patient: Any systemic therapy or radiotherapy prior to enrollment
  • LGG patients: history of allergic reaction or contraindications to the use of carboplatin or vincristine
  • Stem cell transplant within the past 3 months
  • History of heart disease
  • Pregnant or lactating females
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02684058). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search