Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=599 Randomized Treatment

To Compare the Effects of Immediate-release Tacrolimus and Astagraf XL on Donor-Specific Antibody (DSA) Formation and the Development of Immune Activation (IA) in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients

Kidney Transplantation

Enrolled (actual)
599
Serious AEs
52.0%
Results posted
Jun 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for de Novo DSA (dnDSA) or Immune Activation (IA) Occurrence — 35.6; 34.4 percentage of participants — p=0.5777

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Tacrolimus (Drug); Tacrolimus immediate release (Drug)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult · 16+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Primary completion
Jun 2019

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for de Novo DSA (dnDSA) or Immune Activation (IA) Occurrence
35.6; 34.4 0.5777
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative or Indeterminate for dnDSA Occurrence
5.5; 4.3; 90.5; 92.8; 4; 2.5
SECONDARY
Peak Mean Fluorescence Intensity (MFI) of DSA Positive Participants
6119.21; 2727.99
SECONDARY
Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Weak, Moderate and Strong Antibody Strentgh
0; 0; 73.3; 83.3; 26.7; 16.7 0.6618
SECONDARY
Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With DSA Persistence
73.3; 50
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for Complement Component 1, Q Subcomponent (C1q)-Binding DSA
1.8; 0.4; 98.2; 99.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive or Negative for DSA Immunoglobulin G (IgG3) Isotype
0.7; 1.1; 99.3; 98.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of DSA Positive Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen, Class II, DQ Locus (HLA-DQ)
40; 25
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 1 to Day 365 Visit
31.3; 31.2 0.8518
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Positive for IA Occurrence From Day 30 to Day 365 Visit
21.8; 21.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With IA Persistence
7.3; 10
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Transplant Glomerulopathy (TG) on Biopsy
6.5; 6.6 1.0000
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Microcirculatory Inflammation (MI) on Biopsy
8.9; 5.9 0.4750
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Presence of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy (IFTA) and Inflammation on Biopsy
26; 16.9 0.0939
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) Threshold of <30 Millimetre Per Minute Per 1.73 Meter Square (mL/Min/1.73m^2)
1.5; 1.8
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <40 mL/Min/1.73m^2
9.5; 5.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With eGFR Threshold of <50 mL/Min/1.73m^2
25.5; 19.7 0.1160
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With a Five-point Decline in eGFR
13.1; 11.1 0.4995
SECONDARY
eGFR at Day 30, Day 90, Day 180, Day 270 and Day 365
50.86; 52.72; 55.56; 57.10; 56.81; 58.33
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Graft Loss
1.5; 1.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Died
0.7; 0.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)
7.6; 8.2
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants Who Were Lost to Follow-up
0; 0.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Either Graft Loss, Death, BPAR or Lost to Follow-up
9.1; 10.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Any Antibody-Mediated Rejection (ABMR)
1.6; 0.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Normal Biopsy Findings
6.5; 4.4
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With C4d Deposition Without Active Rejection
0.8; 0.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Acute ABMR
1.6; 0.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III Acute ABMR
50; 0; 50; 100; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Chronic ABMR
0; 0
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Borderline Changes
14.6; 14.7
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Acute T-cell Mediated Rejection (TCMR)
6.5; 5.9
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Chronic TCMR
25; 12.5
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Grade I, II and III IFTA
54.5; 56.6; 18.7; 15.4; 5.7; 6.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Any Additional Findings
29.3; 34.6
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Glomerulitis (g) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
89.4; 90.4; 5.7; 6.6; 4.1; 1.5 0.6327
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Tubulitis (t) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
79.7; 79.4; 16.3; 15.4; 1.6; 1.5 0.9701
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Intimal Arteritis (v) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
93.5; 94.9; 2.4; 2.2; 2.4; 0 0.3127
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Mononuclear Cell Interstitial Inflammation (i) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
68.3; 76.5; 26.8; 17.6; 4.1; 2.2 0.0830
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Glomerular Basement Membrane Double Contours (cg) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
93.5; 93.4; 5.7; 3.7; 0; 1.5 0.6022
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Tubular Atrophy (ct) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
20.3; 21.3; 53.7; 55.9; 19.5; 15.4 0.9249
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Interstitial Fibrosis (ci) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
21.1; 20.6; 52.8; 56.6; 19.5; 15.4 0.9136
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Vascular Fibrous Intimal Thickening (cv) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
33.3; 36; 40.7; 41.2; 22; 17.6 0.8789
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Arteriolar Hyalinosis (ah) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
91.1; 86.8; 4.1; 5.9; 4.1; 3.7 0.5574
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Peritubular Capillaritis (Ptc) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
91.1; 90.4; 3.3; 5.1; 4.9; 2.9 0.8150
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Mesangial Matrix Expansion (mm) Biopsy Score Assessed Using Banff Lesion Scores
87.8; 91.2; 8.9; 6.6; 2.4; 0.7 0.5673
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of DSA
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of HLA-DQ DSA
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of C1q-binding DSA
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of DSA IgG3 Isotype
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of IA
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of TG on Biopsy
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to Occurrence of Death
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Local BPAR
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Acute Forms of ABMR
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Chronic Forms of ABMR
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Acute TCMR
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Chronic TCMR
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of Borderline Changes
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Time to First Occurrence of IFTA
NA; NA
SECONDARY
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Event(TEAEs), Related TEAEs, Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Event (TESAEs), Related TESAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment and TEAEs Leading to Death
99.7; 98.6; 77.8; 70.7; 56.6; 47.4

Summary

This study compared the incidence of a two-part composite endpoint consisting of de novo donor specific antibody (DSA) formation or a designation of immune activation (IA) on peripheral blood molecular profiling in participants maintained on twice daily, immediate-release tacrolimus versus those maintained on Astagraf XL in the first year post-transplant.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Recipient of a de novo kidney from a living or deceased donor. Note: Recipient of an en bloc deceased donor kidney transplant from a pediatric donor ≥5 years of age AND weighing greater than 20 kg is allowed.
  • If deceased donor, a Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) ≤ 85 (Donation after Circulatory Death [DCD] and what was previously known as extended criteria donor [ECD] organ recipients are eligible for enrollment provided KDPI ≤85).
  • At least one antigen mismatch at major Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) (class I or class II).
  • Willingness to comply with study protocol.
  • Subject agrees not to participate in another investigational drug study while on treatment.
  • Female subject must be either:

a. Of non-child-bearing potential i. Post-menopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses) prior to screening, or ii. Documented surgically sterile or status post-hysterectomy b. Or, if of childbearing potential, i. Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 90 days after the final study drug administration ii. And have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to transplant procedure iii. And, if heterosexually active, agree to consistently use two forms of highly effective birth control (at least one of which must be a barrier method) which includes consistent and correct usage of established oral contraception, established intrauterine device or intrauterine system, or barrier methods of contraception: condom or occlusive cap (diaphragm or cervical/vault caps) with spermicidal foam/gel/film/cream/suppository or vasectomy in the male partner, starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.

  • Male subject and their female spouse/partners who are of childbearing potential must be using highly effective contraception consisting of two forms of birth control (one of which must be a barrier method) starting at screening and continuing throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Male subject must not donate sperm starting at screening throughout the study period and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Female subject must not donate ova starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 90 days after the final study drug administration.
  • Will be receiving induction immunotherapy (either T-cell depleting agent, anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, or Interleukin-2 (IL-2) co-stimulation blocker), with dose and frequency of the chosen induction agent determined by local standard of care. Steroid-only induction therapy does not satisfy this criterion.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patient is known to have a positive test for latent Tuberculosis (TB) and has not previously received adequate anti-microbial therapy or would require TB prophylaxis after transplant.
  • Uncontrolled concomitant infection or any unstable medical condition that could interfere with study objectives.
  • Significant liver disease, defined as having, during the past 28 days, consistently elevated Aspartate Aminotransferase, GOT (AST) Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and/or Alanine Aminotransferase, GPT (ALT) Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SPGT) levels greater than 3 times the upper value of the normal range of the investigational site.
  • Patient currently taking or maintained on another form of extended-release tacrolimus following his/her transplant procedure.
  • Patient who will be maintained on a non-tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppressive regimen following his/her transplant procedure.
  • Patient currently taking, having taken within 30 days, or who will be maintained on an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor following his/her transplant procedure.
  • Use of an investiga
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02723591). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search