Phase 3
Completed N=153
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Experimental Drugs ABT- 493/ABT-530 in Adults With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1-6 Infection and Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 Coinfection (EXPEDITION-2)
Hepatitis C · Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection · Chronic Hepatitis C · Compensated Cirrhosis and Non-cirrhotics
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02738138 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
153
Serious AEs
2.6%
Results posted
May 2018
Primary outcomePrimary: Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12) — 98.0 percentage of participants
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
147citations · ~18 / year
Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Patients Coinfected With Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: The EXPEDITION-2 Study.
Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of ABT-493/ABT-530 in adults with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1-6 infection and human immunodeficiency virus-1 co-infection.
Linked Publications (4)
-
Efficacy and Safety of Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir in Patients Coinfected With Hepatitis C Virus and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: The EXPEDITION-2 Study.
-
Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with chronic HCV and recent drug use: An integrated analysis of 7 phase III studies.
-
Efficacy and safety of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with chronic HCV infection and psychiatric disorders: An integrated analysis.
-
Integrated analysis of 8-week glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in Japanese and overseas patients without cirrhosis and with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 2 infection.
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response 12 Weeks Post-treatment (SVR12) |
98.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With On-treatment Virologic Failure |
0.7 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Participants With Post-treatment Relapse |
— | — |
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Male or female, at least 18 years of age at time of Screening.
- Screening laboratory result indicating Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT)1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or 6-infection.
- Subject has positive anti-HCV antibody (Ab) and plasma HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) viral load greater than or equal to 1000 IU/mL at Screening visit.
- Subjects must be HCV treatment-naïve (i.e., subject has never received a single dose of any approved or investigational anti-HCV medication) or HCV treatment-experienced (subject who has failed prior IFN or pegylated-interferon [pegIFN] with or without ribavirin [RBV], or sofosbuvir [SOF] plus RBV with or without pegIFN). GT3 subjects must be HCV treatment-naïve. Previous HCV treatment must have been completed greater than or equal to 2 months prior to Screening.
- Subjects naïve to antiretroviral treatment (ART) must have CD4+ count greater than or equal to 500 cells/mm^3 (or CD4+ % greater than or equal to 29%) at Screening; or Subjects on a stable ART regimen must have
- CD4+ count greater than or equal to 200 cells/mm^3 (or CD4+ % greater than or equal to 14%) at Screening; and
- Plasma HIV-1 RNA below lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) at Screening and at least once during the 12 months prior to Screening.
Exclusion Criteria
- Recent (within 6 months prior to study drug administration) history of drug or alcohol abuse that could preclude adherence to the protocol in the opinion of the investigator.
- Positive test result at Screening for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).
- Positive Human Immunodeficiency virus, type 2 (HIV-2) Ab at Screening.
- Receipt of any other investigational or commercially available direct acting anti-HCV agents other than sofosbuvir (e.g., telaprevir, boceprevir, simeprevir, paritaprevir, grazoprevir, daclatasvir, ledipasvir, ombitasvir, elbasvir or dasabuvir).
- Consideration by the investigator, for any reason, that the subject is an unsuitable candidate to receive ABT-493/ABT-530.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02738138) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.