N/A Completed N=50 Randomized Prevention

Forced-air Warming in Endovascular Surgery: Testing Effectiveness of Two Different Blanket Models

Hypothermia

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02742818 ↗

Enrolled (actual)

Serious AEs

2.0%

Results posted

Jan 2018

Primary outcomePrimary: Values of Body Temperature ( in Celsius Degree ) in Two Groups of Patients Undergoing EVAR and LEA That Will Use Two Different Types of Bair Hugger 3M Body Warming Blankets, Namely: 522 Upper Body Blanket and 635 Full Access Underbody Blanket. — 36.2; 36.1 Celsius degrees — p=0.190

Summary

Prospective randomized trial comparing effectiveness of two different forced-air warming blankets in patients undergoing lower extremity angioplasty (LEA) and endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Outcome Measures

Outcome	Result	p-value
PRIMARY Values of Body Temperature ( in Celsius Degree ) in Two Groups of Patients Undergoing EVAR and LEA That Will Use Two Different Types of Bair Hugger 3M Body Warming Blankets, Namely: 522 Upper Body Blanket and 635 Full Access Underbody Blanket.	36.2; 36.1	0.190
SECONDARY Age ( in Years)	70; 71	0.820
SECONDARY Gender	15; 19; 8; 6	0.529
SECONDARY Type of Surgery ( LEA and EVAR )	13; 12; 12; 11	0.999
SECONDARY Duration of Surgery ( in Minutes)	180; 210	0.462

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

Patients undergoing LEA and EVAR
American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) : 1-4

Exclusion Criteria

Non-endovascular surgery
pregnant patients
patient refusal
less than 45 minutes duration of surgery

View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02742818). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.